Skip to main content

Security report for radektejkl.cz

Radek Tejkl · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radek Tejkl's website serves as a professional portfolio showcasing his expertise in text writing, web development, and graphic design. The site targets small to medium-sized businesses and organizations primarily in the Czech Republic, emphasizing a friendly and creative approach. The business operates as a small freelance service provider with a well-established domain since 2012, supported by positive client testimonials and a portfolio of completed projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing common web technologies such as jQuery, CSS3, and Google Fonts. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no security headers are detected, and privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radektejkl.cz

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche creative services market, focusing on personalized web and graphic design solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in client satisfaction and a reputation for creativity and reliability. The business model is service-based freelance consulting, with revenue likely generated from project-based contracts. The target customers are local businesses and organizations seeking tailored digital presence solutions. The website's portfolio and testimonials indicate a strong partnership ecosystem with various local clients. Growth indicators include a domain age of over a decade and ongoing client endorsements. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital marketing and formalize compliance to enhance market trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security maturity level with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, indicating limited formal security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies points to compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radek Tejkl
Description
Freelance creative professional offering services in text writing, web development, and graphic design with a focus on friendly and creative collaboration.
Key services
Text writing, Web development, Graphic design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, CSS3, HTML5, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress block editor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical links (https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal/professional portfolio for Radek Tejkl offering creative services.
  2. Content is in Czech language with localized focus.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  5. Multiple client testimonials and portfolio links enhance trust.
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture can be improved.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and libraries.
  9. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection forms present.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with standard plugins such as Testimonial Rotator and uses jQuery and Font Awesome libraries. The design employs Google Fonts and custom CSS for styling and responsiveness. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata and structured data beyond basic JSON endpoints. No analytics or tracking tools are integrated, which limits marketing insights. The hosting provider is WEDOS, a reputable Czech hosting company. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated components if not regularly maintained. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radektejkl.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radektejkl.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.