Skip to main content

Security report for radegast.cz

Radegast Pivovar · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radegast Pivovar is a Czech brewery brand specializing in producing beer with a strong regional presence in Moravia and Silesia and recognition across the Czech Republic. The website emphasizes the brand's heritage dating back to 1970 and targets adult consumers with an age verification gate. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with common plugins for SEO, forms, and cookie consent, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site employs modern tracking and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA on forms, though the absence of explicit security headers and WHOIS data transparency are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving as an effective digital presence for the brewery.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radegast.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leading beer producer in the Moravian and Silesian regions with a loyal customer base and national outreach. Its business model focuses on beer production and brand marketing, targeting adult consumers. The website's integration with social media platforms and marketing tools indicates active engagement with customers and digital marketing strategies. The lack of direct contact information on the site suggests a focus on brand promotion rather than direct sales or support via the website. The absence of WHOIS data may be due to privacy protection but slightly impacts trust. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand image and good content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and age verification to restrict underage access. Cookie consent is well implemented with granular user controls and transparency about tracking cookies. Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms helps mitigate spam and abuse. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The WHOIS data absence reduces transparency and trust slightly. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider providing direct contact information such as support emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Investigate and clarify WHOIS data availability to enhance domain transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radegast Pivovar
Description
Moravská jednička, typická svou hořkou chutí. Vaří se v pivovaru v nošovicich z těch nejkvalitnějších pivovarských surovin z Moravy. První várka spatřila světlo světa 3. prosince 1970. Značka má silnou základnu loajálních konzumentů na Moravě a ve Slezsku, ale oslovuje i mnohé milovníky piva napříč celou republikou...
Key services
beer production, brand marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Cookie Consent Tracker, Flatpickr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • age verification gate
  • cookie consent with granular options
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookie Consent Tracker
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses age verification gate to restrict access to adults only
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and user control
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, which may indicate privacy protection or registry issues
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, forms, and cookie management
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube linked
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  9. Website content is in Czech language targeting Czech and Slovak audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 for form handling, and Cookie Consent Tracker for privacy compliance. It uses jQuery libraries and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integration. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with some custom CSS and JavaScript for UI enhancements. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA indicates attention to form security. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but has room for security and transparency improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radegast.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radegast.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.