Skip to main content

Security report for racingloufc.com

Racing Louisville FC · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Racing Louisville FC operates as a professional women's soccer club with a digital presence focused on delivering team news, player features, and fan engagement content. The website is well integrated within the USL soccer network, linking to multiple official league and partner sites. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript frameworks like React, supported by SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Osano, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the website content and external references support authenticity. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant, serving a general audience of sports fans.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching racingloufc.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Racing Louisville FC as a key player in women's professional soccer, targeting sports enthusiasts and local communities. Its business model revolves around sports entertainment, fan engagement, and brand building within the USL ecosystem. The site leverages partnerships with USL leagues and clubs, enhancing its market presence. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, merchandise, sponsorships, and media rights. The digital platform supports these objectives with content marketing and social media integration. Growth indicators include active social media channels and network affiliations. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance direct contact channels and publish formal security and compliance documentation to bolster trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and a cookie consent banner, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to high but would benefit from formalized policies and clearer communication channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  4. Add explicit business contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Racing Louisville FC
Description
Racing Louisville FC is a professional women's soccer club providing latest news, featured players, and team information.
Key services
Team news and updates, Player features, Match schedules and tickets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, React, Yoast SEO, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Osano Consent Management, SportsEngine platform, ECAL Widget
Frameworks
React
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Pumpjack Analytics, Parsely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Xandr, Quantcast
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Meta Pixel, TVSquared, Simpli.fi
Marketing tools
ShareThis, Pumpjack Analytics, Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Uses modern web technologies and consent management.
  3. Strong integration with USL soccer network and related domains.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust but content appears legitimate.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. Advertising and tracking scripts are extensive but consented.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform enhanced with React for dynamic components, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Pumpjack Analytics, alongside a robust cookie consent solution via Osano. The site loads moderate resources and is mobile optimized with good navigation clarity. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. The technical stack reflects a modern, well-maintained infrastructure suitable for a medium-sized sports organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with racingloufc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review racingloufc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.