Skip to main content

Security report for quretec.com

Quretec OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Quretec OÜ is an Estonian technology company specializing in the development of secure and reliable information systems, with a strong focus on healthcare, government, and transportation sectors. Their offerings include software development services, a proprietary Qure platform for building web-based information systems, and specialized solutions such as health registries, laboratory software, and business information systems. The company targets organizations requiring robust and trustworthy IT solutions, particularly in regulated environments. Technically, the website is built using Mobirise Website Builder with Bootstrap 5, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Animate.css, and parallax effects. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. However, performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. Google Analytics is used for user tracking without visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No forms with data input were detected on the main page, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status, which impacts overall trust. Overall, while the business and website appear professional and focused on secure IT solutions, the missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy compliance documentation represent notable risks. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quretec.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Quretec operates as a small Estonian technology company with a niche focus on secure information systems for healthcare and government clients. Their competitive advantage lies in domain expertise and tailored software solutions, including a proprietary platform that accelerates development. The business model is service and product-based, targeting institutional clients requiring compliance and reliability. Partnerships with public sector entities and participation in EU-supported projects indicate a stable ecosystem. Growth potential exists through expanding platform adoption and healthcare IT services. The company maintains a professional online presence but lacks visible certifications or extensive marketing tools, suggesting a focus on direct client relationships rather than broad consumer marketing.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. Google Analytics tracking is present without clear user consent mechanisms, posing privacy risks under GDPR. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant trust and legitimacy concern. Overall, the security maturity appears basic with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security posture.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is properly published to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Quretec OÜ
VAT number
EE101082228
Registration number
11043739
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Quretec OÜ
Description
Quretec aitab organisatsioonidel olla edukas luues turvalisi ja usaldusväärseid infosüsteeme. Pakub tarkvaraarenduse teenuseid, Qure platvormi, tervise infosüsteeme, laboritarkvara, uuringute tarkvara ja äriinfosüsteeme.
Key services
Tarkvaraarenduse teenused, Qure Platvorm, Tervise infosüsteemid, Laboritarkvara, Uuringute tarkvara, Äriinfosüsteemid
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Mobirise Website Builder v5.6.3, Bootstrap 5.1, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Animate.css, Jarallax (parallax effect), Smooth Scroll, YouTube Player, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and is mobile optimized.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML source.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with no visible opt-out or privacy notice.
  8. Business appears focused on secure and reliable information systems, especially in healthcare and government sectors.
  9. No forms with input fields detected on the main page; contact is via link to a contact page.
  10. No social media links found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mobirise Website Builder using Bootstrap 5, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as Animate.css and Jarallax for visual effects. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics with Tag Manager is implemented for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive and has a professional design but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and parallax effects. No CMS beyond Mobirise is detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to optimize performance, enhance accessibility, and improve SEO through better meta tags and structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quretec.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quretec.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.