Skip to main content

Security report for quickpagex.ch

QuickpageX · Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

QuickpageX is a Swiss-based service providing flexible website solutions tailored primarily for institutional clients such as church communities and aid organizations. The company emphasizes ease of use by allowing clients to focus on content creation while managing technical aspects including domain registration and email accounts. Their market position is niche, focusing on privacy-conscious institutions with a subscription-based business model that includes a free trial period and annual fees. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, integrating privacy-friendly tools like Matomo analytics and OpenStreetMap instead of Google services. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though it lacks some advanced security headers and a published security policy. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business goals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quickpagex.ch

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention quickpagex.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for quickpagex.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

QuickpageX targets a specialized segment of institutional clients in Switzerland, particularly religious and non-profit organizations. Their competitive advantage lies in privacy-focused web services avoiding Google dependencies, appealing to privacy-sensitive customers. The subscription model with included domain and email services provides predictable revenue streams. The company maintains a consistent brand and clear communication channels, including physical address and phone contact. Growth potential is supported by a clear niche focus and tailored service offerings. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The company leverages open-source technologies and privacy-first analytics to differentiate itself in the market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo). No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and lack of published security or incident response policies represent compliance gaps, especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, which could improve defense-in-depth. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security culture appears privacy-conscious but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user transparency.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing data retention policies and clarifying analytics data handling.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
QuickpageX
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
QuickpageX
Description
QuickpageX offers a flexible website solution tailored for institutions, especially church-related organizations in Switzerland. It provides easy website creation focusing on content while handling technical aspects, including domain and email accounts.
Key services
Website creation and hosting, Domain registration, Email accounts, Privacy-focused analytics (Matomo), OpenStreetMap integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), Bootstrap, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, OpenStreetMap, FontinSans fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No Google Analytics, uses privacy-friendly Matomo
  • No Google Maps, uses OpenStreetMap
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on institutional website services with strong privacy emphasis
  3. No cookie consent mechanism found despite privacy focus
  4. Use of Matomo analytics and OpenStreetMap demonstrates privacy-conscious design
  5. Clear contact information and legal pages present
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  7. Modern WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework used
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS (version 6.7.2) with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Matomo analytics hosted on a subdomain, ensuring data privacy. Fonts are custom-hosted, and OpenStreetMap is used for mapping, avoiding Google dependencies. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and deferred emoji scripts. Accessibility features such as skip links and screen-reader shortcuts are implemented, indicating good inclusivity. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the presence of Matomo on a subdomain suggests some level of managed hosting. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quickpagex.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quickpagex.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.