Skip to main content

Security report for quicket.com.au

Quicket · Technology · Australia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Quicket is a well-established online event ticketing platform serving primarily African and Australian markets. It offers a comprehensive suite of event management tools including ticket sales, reserved seating, ticket scanning, real-time analytics, and marketing features. The platform is trusted by over 200,000 events and emphasizes ease of use and customization for event organizers. Technically, the website is built on modern Angular framework with integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and OneTrust for cookie consent. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy restrictions, which is common for commercial domains and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform with moderate tracking and good compliance practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quicket.com.au

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Quicket operates in the technology sector as an essential business entity focused on event ticketing and management. Its business model revolves around providing an online marketplace and tools for event organizers to create, promote, and sell tickets. The platform targets event organizers and attendees, offering scalable solutions from small boutique events to large festivals and conferences. The company leverages partnerships across multiple regional domains to serve diverse markets in Africa and Australia. The presence of advanced marketing tools and analytics indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. The lack of explicit contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on self-service and digital support channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented via OneTrust. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts introduces a moderate level of user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance efforts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve defense-in-depth.
  3. Provide clear contact channels for security incidents such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by publishing a detailed privacy policy and ensuring GDPR compliance across all regions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Quicket
Description
Quicket is an event ticketing platform trusted by over 200,000 events, offering services for festivals, conferences, expos, schools, clubs, and boutique events. It provides tools for event creation, ticket sales, seating plans, ticket scanning, analytics, marketing, and event discovery.
Key services
Event ticket sales, Event creation tools, Reserved seating plans, Ticket scanning app, Real-time analytics, Marketing tools, Custom event pages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 19.2.14, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Zoho MarketingHub, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mailchimp Goal Tracking, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Zoho MarketingHub, Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to privacy or query restrictions.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  4. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Good branding consistency and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 19.2.14, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight), marketing automation (Zoho MarketingHub, Mailchimp), and cookie consent management (OneTrust). The site uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for UI styling. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and alternate hreflang links for regional targeting. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-integrated but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quicket.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quicket.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.