Skip to main content

Security report for quic.cloud

QUIC.cloud · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

QUIC.cloud is a specialized technology company providing a comprehensive WordPress optimization platform that includes CDN-level caching, image and page optimization, security features, and DNS services. Established in 2018, it has positioned itself as a niche leader in WordPress performance enhancement with a growing global network of CDN points of presence. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive service descriptions targeting WordPress site owners and developers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and leverages modern technologies such as LiteSpeed Cache, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is supported by Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and global reach. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and comprehensive metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates CDN-level security features including brute-force protection, reCAPTCHA, Layer-7 DDoS mitigation, and WAF rules tailored for WordPress. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not published, representing an area for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, QUIC.cloud demonstrates a strong security posture, good privacy compliance with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms, and high business credibility. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy. Strategic recommendations include publishing dedicated security and incident response policies, adding security headers, and enhancing transparency around vulnerability disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quic.cloud

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention quic.cloud, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
15,606
Employees
0
Customers
15,606
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for quic.cloud.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

QUIC.cloud operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress website optimization services. Its business model revolves around providing CDN services, image and page optimization, and security enhancements primarily for WordPress users. The company targets website owners, developers, and enterprises seeking to improve site speed and security. Market positioning is strong within its niche, leveraging LiteSpeed technology and a global CDN network. The company maintains active partnerships and sponsorships, as evidenced by sponsor logos and references. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based CDN and optimization services, with enterprise onboarding options for high bandwidth users. The company exhibits growth indicators such as expanding CDN PoPs and client base exceeding 285,000. The partnership ecosystem includes integration with Cloudflare and other hosting providers.

Security posture

The security maturity of QUIC.cloud is solid, with HTTPS enforced and advanced CDN-level protections including brute-force attack mitigation, reCAPTCHA, Layer-7 DDoS protection, and WordPress-specific WAF rules. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness visibility. No security.txt file was found. The company should consider formalizing these aspects to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is strong but can be improved with better documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security controls and practices.
  2. Develop and make publicly available an incident response plan and contact channels for security incidents.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance contact information by providing verified company emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
QUIC.cloud
Description
The first and only complete WordPress optimization solution. QUIC.cloud boosts performance with full CDN-level caching, image optimization, cutting-edge security, and more!
Key services
Caching CDN, Image Optimization, Page Optimization, Security Features, DNS Service
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
LiteSpeed Cache, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Elementor, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CDN-level security features
  • Brute-force protection
  • Layer-7 DDoS protection
  • Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules for WordPress

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong focus on WordPress optimization and CDN services
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  5. Social media presence is active and linked in footer
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  8. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building and LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is backed by Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, ensuring reliability and scalability. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The technical implementation is robust with no visible errors or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security documentation. The site demonstrates low latency CDN performance and advanced caching techniques including dynamic content caching with ESI support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quic.cloud. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quic.cloud.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.