Skip to main content

Security report for queo-valuetec.com

queo valueTec · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

queo valueTec is a German technology company specializing in tailored software solutions aimed at sustainable value creation and business process optimization. The company positions itself as a trusted partner offering services from business analysis through solution architecture, software development, and application management. Their client portfolio includes notable organizations such as VW and Fraunhofer, supported by certifications like TISAX and CPRE, underscoring their commitment to quality and security. Technically, the website is built on the Neos CMS platform using the Flow PHP framework, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Matomo and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and a professional design, reflecting a mature digital presence. Cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-compliant privacy policies are implemented, indicating attention to privacy regulations. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional presentation and certifications. Overall, queo valueTec presents a credible and professional business with a solid technical foundation and reasonable security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data availability would enhance trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching queo-valuetec.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

queo valueTec operates in the technology sector, focusing on custom software development and consulting services. Their business model emphasizes long-term partnerships and tailored solutions to optimize client business processes. The company targets medium to large enterprises seeking specialized software services. Their market position is strengthened by certifications (TISAX, CPRE) and a reputable client base including automotive and research institutions. The company leverages a modern technology stack and maintains active social media presence, supporting brand visibility and client engagement. Growth indicators include diversified service offerings and a clear focus on quality and security standards. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Certifications such as TISAX indicate adherence to recognized security standards. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps in security transparency and defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear secure with no obvious injection points. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain transparency but is not uncommon for privacy-conscious businesses. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formalized incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Work with the domain registrar to ensure WHOIS data is available or justified if privacy protection is used, improving domain trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
queo valueTec
Description
Maßgeschneiderte Software-Lösungen zur Optimierung von Geschäftsprozessen und nachhaltiger Wertschöpfung.
Key services
Business Analyse, Lösungsarchitektur, Software Entwicklung, Application Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Neos CMS, Flow PHP Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in German with professional business focus.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No security.txt or explicit incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in public WHOIS.
  6. Multiple certifications and client logos enhance trust.
  7. Use of modern CMS (Neos) and frameworks (Flow PHP).
  8. Tracking includes Matomo and Facebook Pixel with user consent.
  9. Contact info includes named Head of Technology Consulting with phone and email.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Neos CMS platform with the Flow PHP framework, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. JavaScript libraries including jQuery and custom scripts support interactive features. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Facebook Pixel, integrated with user consent. The site loads media-rich content such as videos and images with moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with queo-valuetec.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review queo-valuetec.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.