Skip to main content

Security report for quan.ge

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website quan.ge operates as a domain sales platform specializing in Chinese and English domain names, including personal names and branded domains. It targets domain buyers interested in acquiring these domains, operating a niche reseller business model. The site is relatively new, with the domain registered in late 2024, consistent with the business launch. The website presents a professional and consistent branding with a clean, responsive design and clear navigation, though it lacks comprehensive business and legal information such as privacy or cookie policies. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Fontello icons. It employs Umami Analytics for minimal user tracking and is hosted with DNS services from Volcengine. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and published security policies. HTTPS usage is implied but not explicitly confirmed from the HTML content. No forms collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of privacy, cookie, and incident response policies indicates compliance gaps. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website content and business model, showing no suspicious patterns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The overall risk assessment indicates a functional and professional domain sales site with moderate trustworthiness but lacking in privacy and security policy transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with strong SSL, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and providing incident response contact information to enhance compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quan.ge

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the domain sales market, focusing on Chinese and English domain names, including personal and branded domains. Its competitive advantage lies in a curated portfolio of domains with Chinese cultural relevance and some English domains, targeting buyers interested in these niches. The business model is straightforward domain reselling, generating revenue from domain sales. The target customers are domain investors, businesses, and individuals seeking specific domain names. Growth indicators include a broad domain portfolio and partnerships with related domain sites. The partnership ecosystem includes several domain-related friendly link partners, enhancing market reach. The company appears small and newly founded in 2024, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. Operations are primarily online with minimal marketing or advertising detected.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. It uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), employs minimal user tracking via Umami Analytics, and does not collect sensitive user data through forms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection or suspicious patterns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency, security headers, and incident response readiness to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify it site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to facilitate reporting and response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website offering domain names for sale, primarily Chinese and some English domain names, including personal names and branded domains.
Key services
Domain name sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Fontello Icons, Umami Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed from HTML content
  • No forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Umami Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain sales platform focused on Chinese and English domains.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. Website uses modern fonts and icon sets with responsive design.
  7. No CMS or backend platform detected; likely static or custom built.
  8. No social media links found.
  9. ICP license displayed indicating compliance with Chinese regulations.
  10. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Google Fonts and Fontello icons for styling and icons. It uses Umami Analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. The site is responsive and mobile optimized with a grid layout for domain listings. Hosting is supported by Volcengine DNS services. No CMS or backend platform is detected, indicating a likely static or custom-built site. Performance is moderate with no obvious technical debt or errors in the HTML content. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are basic but present. Opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to enhance technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quan.ge. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quan.ge.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.