Skip to main content

Security report for quality-fashion-group.de

Corporate Fabrics GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Quality Fashion Group is a premium textile consortium based in Germany, combining top textile companies specializing in fabric production, finishing, and quality control. Their business model focuses on delivering high-quality textiles for corporate, sports, and fashion applications, supported by subsidiaries Corporate Fabrics and EZ Fashion. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting B2B clients in the textile manufacturing sector. Technically, the site uses a modern but somewhat dated stack including Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 3.1.1, with good mobile optimization and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but lacking advanced security headers or explicit security policies. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, and privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional with room for security and technical improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quality-fashion-group.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically textiles, with a unique market position as a consortium of premium textile companies in Germany. Their key competitive advantage is the integrated value chain from design to finishing and quality control. Revenue streams likely come from fabric sales to corporate and fashion clients. The partnership ecosystem includes well-known textile companies such as Erhardt, Knopf's Sohn, and Zuleeg, as well as subsidiaries Corporate Fabrics and EZ Fashion. The business targets medium to large clients requiring premium textile solutions. The website content and structure support a professional B2B image with clear contact information and legal disclosures, indicating a mature and stable business operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. Cookie consent is implemented with opt-in/out for marketing cookies, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no advanced security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected, and no incident response or security policy information is provided. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The absence of exposed sensitive data and minimal third-party tracking reduces risk. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate informational site but could be enhanced with stronger HTTP headers, explicit security policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Verify and document SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Corporate Fabrics GmbH
VAT number
DE813524304
Registration number
HRB 3701
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Corporate Fabrics GmbH
Description
Premium textile group in Germany combining top companies for design, production, finishing, and quality control of fabrics. Includes subsidiaries Corporate Fabrics and EZ Fashion offering specialized textile products.
Key services
Textile production, Textile finishing and refinement, Quality control, Corporate and fashion fabric supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, Bootstrap 3.x, jQuery 3.1.1, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap Icons, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Maps (via cookie consent)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in German with English language option available.
  3. No forms detected on homepage; contact via email and phone only.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with opt-in/out for marketing cookies.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  6. Business information is clearly presented in Impressum with legal details.
  7. No social media links detected in provided HTML.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected except Google Maps mention in cookie policy.
  9. Website uses modern but somewhat dated tech stack (Bootstrap 3, jQuery 3.1.1).
  10. No visible security headers or advanced security features in HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with Bootstrap 3, jQuery 3.1.1, and Slick Carousel for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Hosting is provided by webhosting-franken.de, a German hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. No CMS is identified, suggesting a custom or static site. The cookie consent tool is custom implemented. Technical risks include outdated libraries and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, improve SEO with structured data, and enhance performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quality-fashion-group.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quality-fashion-group.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.