Skip to main content

Security report for qr1.be

QR TIGER · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

QR TIGER operates a QR code generation service, providing users with the ability to create customized QR codes including those with logos. The website analyzed (qr1.be) serves primarily as a landing or redirect page linking to the main QR TIGER platform and blog, with minimal content and limited direct service offerings on this domain. The business appears to be a small technology service provider founded in 2019, focusing on QR code technology solutions. Technically, the site uses modern front-end frameworks such as Bootstrap and FontAwesome, ensuring basic mobile responsiveness and a consistent brand presentation. However, SEO and accessibility optimizations are minimal, and no CMS or hosting details are evident from the HTML content. Security posture is basic but adequate, with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerable libraries, though security headers and policies are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are not present, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is limited to a single support email address, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic, serving as a gateway to the main QR TIGER services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qr1.be

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

QR TIGER positions itself in the technology sector as a QR code service provider targeting businesses and individuals needing QR code generation tools. The business model centers on providing online QR code creation services, supported by blog content and customer support. The domain age of 5 years aligns with a small, established technology startup. The partnership with www.qrcode-tiger.com is evident, indicating a broader service ecosystem. The lack of detailed business information and physical contact details suggests a lean operation focused on digital service delivery. Growth potential exists through enhanced marketing, SEO, and expanded service offerings. The company maintains consistent branding and basic trust signals but could improve transparency and compliance documentation to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is basic. HTTPS is enforced, which is a critical security baseline. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields are present, minimizing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not provided, which could hinder timely security issue resolution. Overall, the site demonstrates foundational security practices but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical security controls to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Provide incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
  5. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses to increase business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
QR TIGER
Description
QR TIGER provides QR code creation services, including QR codes with logos and related blog content.
Key services
QR code creation with logo, Blog content related to QR codes, Customer support via email
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.1.1, FontAwesome 5.3.1, Google Fonts (Merriweather)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL https://qr1.be/)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and primarily serves as a redirect or landing page to the main QR TIGER service.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present on this page.
  3. Contact information is limited to a single support email address.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses are provided.
  5. No security or incident response policies are disclosed.
  6. The site uses modern CSS frameworks and fonts but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  8. No forms present on the page; no data collection beyond email contact link.
  9. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating basic security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 4.1.1 for responsive design, FontAwesome 5.3.1 for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. The HTML is valid and structured but minimalistic, serving mostly as a landing page with links to the main QR TIGER platform. Performance is likely moderate given the use of CDN-hosted libraries and minimal content. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable from the HTML. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features such as ARIA labels or landmarks. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a simple landing page but could be improved for richer user engagement and discoverability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qr1.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qr1.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.