Skip to main content

Security report for qidenus.com

Qidenus Technologies · Technology · Romania

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qidenus Technologies is a specialized manufacturer of high-performance V-shaped book scanners and related capture software, serving a global clientele including libraries, archives, museums, and cultural heritage organizations. The company positions itself as a market leader with a strong product portfolio and a network of trusted partners and distributors worldwide. The website reflects a professional and well-branded digital presence with comprehensive product information and customer engagement features. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and analytics, hosted on LiteSpeed servers with PHP 8.1. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential risks. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with cookie policies and consent mechanisms, but GDPR compliance indicators are limited. Overall, the business credibility is strong, but the security posture requires urgent improvement to protect data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qidenus.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, focusing on book scanning hardware and software solutions. Its business model is B2B with a global distribution network targeting institutions requiring digitization services. The presence of partner logos and testimonials indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. The website content is rich and professionally presented, supporting strong market positioning. Revenue streams likely include hardware sales, software licensing, and support services. The company emphasizes quality, innovation, and customer support as competitive advantages. Growth indicators include recent partnerships and active news updates. Strategic observations suggest potential for expanding digital services and enhancing security to meet evolving compliance requirements.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of HTTPS and SSL/TLS encryption, which is a critical vulnerability. While no immediate vulnerabilities like exposed credentials or known exploits are visible, the absence of secure protocols undermines user trust and data protection. Compliance gaps exist in GDPR and incident response readiness, with no visible security policies or dedicated contact channels for security incidents. The use of cookie consent tools is positive but insufficient without full privacy compliance. The security culture appears limited on the public-facing site. Business impact of these gaps includes potential data interception, reduced customer confidence, and regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and configure security headers such as HSTS.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies including dedicated contact channels.
  4. Enhance GDPR compliance by improving privacy policy details and cookie consent transparency.
  5. Regularly audit website and server security configurations and update software dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kronsega Out S.R.L.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with PHP 8.1, WordPress 6.8.1, and LiteSpeed server, supported by SEO and analytics plugins like Yoast SEO Premium and MonsterInsights. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features at a basic level. Performance data is unavailable, but caching is enabled via LiteSpeed Cache. The technical debt is moderate due to missing SSL and incomplete security configurations. Modernization opportunities include upgrading security protocols and enhancing accessibility and performance monitoring. Technical risks include exposure to man-in-the-middle attacks and potential SEO penalties due to lack of HTTPS.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qidenus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qidenus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.