Skip to main content

Security report for qevents.lv

SIA UNIQUE · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Q Events, operated by SIA UNIQUE, is a Latvian event agency specializing in comprehensive event planning, organization, and coordination services. Their offerings include corporate events, presentations, team building activities, conferences, entertainment events, and private and public gatherings. The company emphasizes unique ideas, quality, and non-standard solutions, positioning itself as a creative and reliable partner in the Latvian event market. The website is professionally designed using WordPress, featuring modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and mapping. The site is mobile optimized and provides clear navigation and contact information, including social media links. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the business appears legitimate and well-presented, serving a small to medium client base in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qevents.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the event management sector, targeting corporate and private clients in Latvia and potentially international customers. Their business model is service-based, focusing on full-service event solutions from concept to execution. The presence of partner domains and client logos indicates a networked approach and some market presence. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and transparency. The website's use of common analytics and marketing tools reflects standard digital marketing practices. The company’s size is small, with a focused local market presence and a consistent brand identity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of outdated jQuery version 2.1.4 may pose security risks if not regularly patched. No forms were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, updated libraries, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor website security posture and compliance with GDPR and other relevant regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA UNIQUE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA UNIQUE
Description
Pasākumu aģentūra “Q Events” piedāvā pasākumu plānošanu, organizēšanu un koordinēšanu ar uzsvaru uz aizraujošām idejām, nestandarta risinājumiem un pilna servisa pakalpojumiem no idejas līdz realizācijai, tostarp tehnisko nodrošinājumu.
Key services
Corporate events, Presentations, Team building and sports events, Conferences and seminars, Entertainment events in nightclubs, Private events, Public events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.4, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, Owl Carousel, Flexslider, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  5. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook is linked.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  9. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  10. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a combination of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 2.1.4, Flexslider, and Owl Carousel for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking and analytics, while Google Maps API provides location services. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses asynchronous script loading for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with moderate performance. No advanced hosting or CDN information is available. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic SEO optimization with canonical tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. Technical debt is moderate due to older library versions and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qevents.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qevents.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.