Skip to main content

Security report for qbets.de

Qbet · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qbet is a German-focused online gambling platform offering casino games, live casino, and sports betting services. The website promotes a unique real-time cashback system without wagering requirements, targeting adult users interested in online gambling in Germany. The platform features a professional design with consistent branding and a good user experience, optimized for mobile devices. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies, including Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, custom fonts, and structured data for SEO. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied and Cloudflare protection, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Business credibility is supported by professional content and consistent domain usage, though contact information is missing. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy for its niche but requires improvements in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qbets.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention qbets.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for qbets.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qbet operates in the online gambling sector, focusing on the German market with offerings in casino slots, live casino, and sports betting. Its business model revolves around attracting users with bonuses and a cashback system, likely generating revenue through player losses and betting margins. The platform collaborates with multiple game providers, as evidenced by the extensive list of game logos. The use of Cloudflare and structured data indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the lack of visible contact and compliance information may impact user trust and regulatory adherence. The site appears to be medium-sized with a focused market approach, but no information on founding year or parent company is available.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, which provide baseline security and performance benefits. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided content, and no published security or incident response policies are available. Forms for login and registration exist but lack visible security details such as CSRF tokens or input validation indicators. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are presented. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing and publishing comprehensive security and privacy measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and display certifications or trust seals to improve user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Qbet
Description
Qbet Casino Deutschland bietet ein einzigartiges Echtzeit-Cashback-System ohne Umsatzbedingungen. Entdecken Sie Top-Slots, Live-Casino & Sportwetten mit schnellen Auszahlungen und exklusiven Boni!
Key services
Online casino games, Live casino, Sports betting, Cashback system, Bonuses and promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, Custom fonts (Inter), JSON-LD structured data
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://qbets.de/de-de/)
  • Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional German online casino and sports betting platform
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content
  3. No explicit contact information or security incident response contacts found
  4. Uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN, improving security and performance
  5. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges
  6. Content is adult-oriented gambling but no explicit adult content
  7. Limited external links, mostly internal and one affiliate/referral link
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided content
  9. Forms present for search and login/register but no detailed form fields or security measures visible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with custom fonts and responsive design elements. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, enhancing security and performance. Structured data in JSON-LD format is used for SEO and organizational information. The site includes interactive elements such as search and login forms, though detailed form security is not visible. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading of images. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data but could benefit from more comprehensive metadata and sitemap inclusion.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qbets.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qbets.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.