Security report for qad.com
QAD Inc. · Manufacturing · United States
Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.
QAD Inc. is a well-established enterprise software provider specializing in cloud-based ERP and supply chain solutions tailored for global manufacturing companies. The company has a strong market position with a comprehensive portfolio that includes adaptive ERP, quality management, supply chain planning, and digital commerce solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content targeting manufacturing industry stakeholders worldwide. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Liferay CMS, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and employs security best practices including HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and cookie consent management. Security posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, although explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found. Overall, the domain registration details align with the company’s identity, supporting high legitimacy and trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency on incident response and vulnerability disclosure to further strengthen security culture and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 88/ 100 · Low
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
- CWE-326
- OWASP A04:2025
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-13: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching qad.com
This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 72
- Security headers
- 85
- Email security
- 82
- DNS health
- 85
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 88
- Average
- 85
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Publish explicit incident response and security contact information on the Trust Center or a dedicated security page.
- Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
- Enhance data retention policy transparency related to analytics and user data.
- Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
- Continue to maintain and update security certifications and compliance documentation.
Contact details published on the site
- Addresses
- Legal name
- QAD Inc.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- QAD Inc.
- Description
- QAD Inc. is a leading provider of flexible, cloud-based enterprise resource planning (ERP) and supply chain software and services for global manufacturing companies. QAD Adaptive ERP for manufacturing supports operational requirements in the areas of financials, customer management, supply chain, manufacturing, service and support, analytics, business process management and integration. QAD's portfolio includes related solutions for quality management system (QMS) software, supply chain management software, transportation management software and B2B interoperability. Since 1979, QAD solutions have enabled customers in the automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, high tech, industrial manufacturing, and life sciences industries to better align operations with their strategic goals.
- Key services
- Adaptive ERP, Quality Management System (QMS), Supply Chain Management, Transportation Management, B2B Interoperability, Professional Services
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- jQuery, Liferay, Wistia video player, Google reCAPTCHA, OneTrust cookie consent, Drift chat, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Marketo forms, 6sense
- Frameworks
- Liferay
- Platforms
- Cloud-based ERP
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 90/100
- Good practices seen
- Use of HTTPS
- reCAPTCHA on forms
- Cookie consent management
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security headers
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, 6sense
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Tracking pixels
- Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, 6sense
- Marketing tools
- Marketo, Drift
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Comprehensive and professional website with clear navigation
- Strong focus on manufacturing ERP and supply chain solutions
- Multiple forms with reCAPTCHA for spam protection
- Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
- Cookie consent and privacy policies implemented with OneTrust
- No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges
- Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Liferay)
- Presence of video content and customer testimonials
- Contact information clearly available including phone, email, and address
- Security best practices observed but no explicit incident response contacts
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 80/100Low24 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with qad.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qad.com.