Skip to main content

Security report for puzzlewebs.cz

PuzzleWebs · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PuzzleWebs is a small-scale web presence currently under development, as indicated by the placeholder message on the homepage. The company appears to be based in the Czech Republic with domain registration dating back to 2018, suggesting a relatively recent establishment. The website currently offers minimal information about its business model, services, or market positioning, limiting insights into its commercial operations or target audience. The only contact information available is a company email address. From a technical perspective, the website uses Cloudflare for DNS and hosting services and integrates Tawk.to for live chat functionality. However, the site lacks comprehensive metadata, SEO optimization, and accessibility features. The performance is likely moderate given the minimal content, but no explicit mobile optimization or accessibility features are evident. The absence of a CMS or frameworks suggests a simple static or minimal site setup. Security posture is weak due to the lack of visible security headers, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (given Cloudflare usage), no explicit SSL configuration details are provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or forms, which reduces immediate risk but also indicates limited functionality. Overall, the security maturity is low, and compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not demonstrated. The overall risk assessment is moderate to low due to the minimal attack surface but is impacted by the lack of transparency and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, enhancing website content and structure, and establishing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puzzlewebs.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PuzzleWebs currently operates with a minimal online footprint, indicating either a startup phase or a placeholder for future development. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust indicators limits competitive analysis. The use of Tawk.to suggests an intent to engage visitors via live chat, which could be a customer service or sales channel. The domain age and registration data support legitimacy but do not provide insights into revenue streams or partnerships. The absence of social media or additional contact methods constrains marketing and customer outreach capabilities. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the current data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low level of security maturity. Key gaps include missing security headers, no published security or incident response policies, and absence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The integration of third-party live chat (Tawk.to) introduces a potential vector for data collection but no analytics or tracking services beyond this are detected. GDPR compliance is not evidenced by any policy or consent mechanism. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which is positive for transparency. Overall, the site is low risk due to minimal content but requires significant improvements to meet standard security and privacy expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  4. Enhance website content quality and structure to improve user trust and business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party integrations like Tawk.to for privacy and security compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PuzzleWebs
Description
A website under development with a placeholder message indicating a new website is coming soon.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, Tawk.to
Performance
moderate
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tawk.to
Marketing tools
Tawk.to
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is under construction with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Only one contact email found in body content.
  4. Uses Tawk.to for live chat support integration.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. Domain registration is consistent and legitimate.
  7. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  8. No forms or data collection fields present.
  9. No social media links or phone numbers found.
  10. No business certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, leveraging its DNS and likely CDN services, which provides baseline protection and performance benefits. The only detected third-party technology is Tawk.to for live chat support. No CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating a simple static site or minimal custom development. The HTML content is minimal with no metadata, SEO tags, or structured data, limiting search engine visibility and accessibility. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but lacks optimization indicators. The absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt and modernization opportunities to improve compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puzzlewebs.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puzzlewebs.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.