Skip to main content

Security report for puxdesign.cz

PUXdesign · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PUXdesign is a Czech-based company specializing in web design and web application development, targeting businesses seeking professional digital solutions. The company presents a professional and modern website built on React and Gatsby frameworks, indicating a good level of digital maturity. The site includes contact forms integrated with Sendinblue and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed and functional but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of puxdesign.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puxdesign.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention puxdesign.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,151
Employees
136
Customers
64
Third parties
951
Weak passwords
1%

Latest record dated 2026-06-13 · 100 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for puxdesign.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –dev3.linda.puxdesign.cz2026-06-13
  • –confluence.puxdesign.cz2026-06-07
  • –dev7.linda.puxdesign.cz2026-05-28
  • –dev3.conrad.puxdesign.cz2026-05-25
  • –market.tasy2.client.puxdesign.cz2026-05-25

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PUXdesign operates as a service provider in the technology sector, focusing on web design and development. Its market position appears as a small, local player in the Czech Republic with a clear business model centered on custom digital solutions. The company targets businesses and organizations needing web presence and applications. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional content, with contact details and social media presence supporting business credibility. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company likely generates revenue through project-based contracts and digital services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA on forms, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site should improve privacy and cookie policy disclosures to align with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response contact channels are not provided, which is a gap in security readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration data to enhance domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Puxdesign s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ12345678
Registration number
12345678
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PUXdesign
Description
PUXdesign is a Czech company specializing in web design and development of web applications. They offer services including website creation, web application development, and digital solutions tailored to clients' needs.
Key services
Web design, Web application development, Digital solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Sendinblue (email forms), Google reCAPTCHA, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Sendinblue
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Website uses modern React/Gatsby stack with Sendinblue for forms.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided content.
  5. Contact information including emails and phone numbers are present and clearly labeled.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  8. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, which support fast and responsive user experiences. Integration with Sendinblue for email forms and Google reCAPTCHA for spam prevention indicates a mature approach to form handling. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices with proper meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of assets and caching strategies. No CMS is detected, suggesting a static site generation approach. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puxdesign.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puxdesign.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.