Skip to main content

Security report for pussyleaks.pro

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Other · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pussyleaks.pro is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of explicit pornographic videos across a wide range of categories. The site targets an adults-only audience and monetizes primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing with adult cam sites. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery and lazy loading for performance optimization and supports multiple languages for international reach. However, the site lacks critical privacy and security policies, and no contact information is provided, which impacts trust and compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks advanced headers and DNSSEC. WHOIS data indicates a stable domain registration with Danesco Trading Ltd. in Estonia, consistent with the business age and operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pussyleaks.pro

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche adult content sector, offering free access to explicit videos and leveraging affiliate partnerships with popular adult cam platforms. Its business model relies on high traffic volumes and advertising revenue. The site supports multiple languages, indicating a global target audience. The lack of privacy and terms policies suggests limited compliance focus, which may pose risks in regulated jurisdictions. The partnership ecosystem includes known adult traffic and ad networks, supporting monetization. The company behind the domain is small-sized with no public subsidiaries or parent companies identified.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic; HTTPS is used but no DNSSEC or security headers like CSP or HSTS are detected. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, and no incident response contacts are available. The site does not expose sensitive data but lacks formal security policies and frameworks. This exposes the business to potential compliance and security risks, especially given the adult content nature requiring strict age verification and data protection. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  4. Add age verification mechanisms to comply with legal requirements for adult content.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising partners to minimize security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
Pussyleaks.pro is an adult entertainment website offering free pornographic videos featuring explicit content such as nude pussies, various sexual categories, and adult video streaming.
Key services
Free adult video streaming, Adult content categorization, Affiliate marketing via adult cam sites, Advertising network integration
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Vanilla LazyLoad 12.4.0, AddThis social sharing, Custom JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https://pussyleaks.pro/)
  • Sandbox attributes on iframes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficOX.com
Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult content streaming platform with extensive categories and internationalization.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided for business or security contact.
  4. Advertising and affiliate marketing are primary monetization methods.
  5. No advanced security headers or policies detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Content is explicit adult material with no age verification.
  7. Site uses common JavaScript libraries and lazy loading for images.
  8. Multiple external adult cam sites linked as partners or affiliates.
  9. WHOIS data shows stable registration with Danesco Trading Ltd. in Estonia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard tech stack with jQuery and lazy loading for images, supporting good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Hosting details are limited but name servers indicate a hosting provider likely specialized in adult content. Performance is moderate with multiple embedded iframes for ads and cam sites. The site lacks a CMS or framework indication, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA or advanced features detected. Technical debt includes missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance features, which should be addressed to improve overall site quality and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pussyleaks.pro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pussyleaks.pro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.