Skip to main content

Security report for purestorage.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain www.everpuredata.com appears to be unregistered or expired, as indicated by the raw WHOIS data showing 'No match for domain'. The website content is minimal, consisting mostly of scripts and no meaningful visible content or business information. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected, nor any contact information or security policies. The technical infrastructure includes marketing and tracking scripts such as Marketo and Adobe Helix RUM, but no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. The security posture is weak with no security headers or SSL configuration information available. Overall, the site is either parked, suspended, or blocked by a WAF, making it inaccessible for proper analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching purestorage.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of registration and absence of business content, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of active operations, market positioning, or partnerships. The domain does not present any competitive advantages or clear business model. No revenue streams or target customer segments are identifiable.

Security posture

The security posture is poor with no HTTPS or security headers detected. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking scripts without privacy controls suggests potential privacy compliance gaps. The domain's unregistered status further undermines trust and security credibility.

Recommendations

  1. Register or renew the domain to establish legitimacy and control
  2. Develop a professional website with clear business information and contact details
  3. Implement HTTPS and security headers to improve security posture
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure compliance
  5. Establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure processes to enhance trust
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS data shows no registration and the raw WHOIS output indicates 'No match for domain'. The HTML content is truncated and contains mostly scripts and minimal visible content, indicating possible domain parking, suspension, or blocking by a WAF or registrar. No meaningful website content is accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Marketo, Adobe Helix RUM, Typekit Fonts, 6sense, ESL Utils
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo, Adobe Helix RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo, Adobe, Facebook Connect
Marketing tools
Marketo, 6sense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Domain is not registered or WHOIS data is unavailable
  2. Website content is minimal and mostly scripts with no visible business content
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details available
  5. Multiple external marketing and tracking scripts detected
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available
  7. Likely domain parking, suspension, or blocked by WAF
  8. No evidence of business operations or active website
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses several marketing and tracking technologies including Marketo, Adobe Helix RUM, and 6sense. However, the site lacks a detectable CMS or hosting provider information. The HTML content is mostly scripts with minimal visible content, indicating either a placeholder or blocked site. Performance and mobile optimization appear basic due to lack of content. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are minimal or absent. The technical debt is high given the lack of meaningful content and security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with purestorage.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review purestorage.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.