Skip to main content

Security report for puratos.ng

Puratos · Manufacturing · Nigeria

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Puratos is a global manufacturer and supplier specializing in bakery, patisserie, and chocolate ingredients and products, targeting professional bakers, pastry chefs, and chocolatiers. The Nigerian localized website reflects a well-structured and content-rich platform offering product discovery, recipes, and consumer insights, supporting its B2B business model. The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS and integrates modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and FontAwesome for icons. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puratos.ng

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Puratos maintains a strong global presence with multiple regional websites linked via hreflang tags, indicating a well-established international footprint. The business model focuses on supplying ingredients and solutions to food professionals, with a large product catalog and recipe resources enhancing customer engagement. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via contact forms. The company appears to operate in the manufacturing sector with a large organizational size, though specific founding year and parent company details are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS as implied by canonical URLs, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. The presence of forms without visible anti-CSRF tokens or explicit security measures suggests potential vulnerabilities if not properly managed server-side. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, which requires careful configuration to avoid privacy issues. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies on the analyzed page is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, explicit policies, and secure form handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Ensure all forms include anti-CSRF tokens and robust input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts, especially Google Tag Manager configurations, to mitigate tracking and privacy risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct contact information and security incident response contacts to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Puratos
Description
Puratos helps bakers, patissiers and chocolatiers finding the best products and ingredients to improve the quality of baked products.
Key services
Bakery products, Patisserie products, Chocolate products, Recipes, Consumer insights, Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Handlebars.js, jQuery (implied by usage of dropdowns and toggles)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML.
  3. Contact information is only available via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. WHOIS data is incomplete and domain status indicates registration issues.
  5. Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and modern web technologies.
  6. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed.
  8. No social media links or company emails explicitly found in HTML.
  9. Website targets professional bakers, patissiers, and chocolatiers in Nigeria.
  10. Multiple international related domains linked via hreflang tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. It uses modern front-end technologies including lazy loading for images, FontAwesome icons, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and hreflang implementations for internationalization. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No hosting provider or server details were identified. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puratos.ng. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puratos.ng.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.