Skip to main content

Security report for puratos.md

Puratos · Manufacturing · Moldova

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Puratos Moldova operates a professional B2B website dedicated to bakery, patisserie, and chocolate professionals, offering a wide range of ingredients and products to improve finished goods quality. The company is part of the international Puratos Group, with a strong market position in the food manufacturing sector. The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies and providing localized content for the Moldovan market. While the site is well-designed and content-rich, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as visible contact information, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved with additional security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but should enhance privacy compliance and transparency to improve user confidence and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching puratos.md

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Puratos Moldova targets professional bakers, confectioners, and chocolatiers, supplying essential ingredients and recipes. The business model focuses on B2B sales and support, with a broad international presence indicated by numerous localized domains. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Tag Manager for analytics and user tracking. The website content and structure support a strong brand image and market positioning in the manufacturing and retail sectors. However, the absence of direct contact details and privacy documentation may limit customer engagement and compliance. The company appears to maintain a consistent branding strategy and offers a comprehensive product range, indicating a mature and stable business operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a baseline security awareness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of explicit security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. The site’s forms appear standard but lack visible advanced security features. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and link comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website.
  2. Implement cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program.
  6. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Puratos
Description
Puratos ajută brutarii, cofetarii și ciocolatierii să găsească cele mai bune produse și ingrediente pentru a îmbunătăți calitatea produselor finite.
Key services
Product supply, Recipes, Services, Consumer insights, Blog and news, Career opportunities, Contact support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, Century Gothic font, jQuery (implied by slick and bootstrap classes)
Frameworks
AEM CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B platform for Puratos Moldova
  2. Content is rich with product and recipe information
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in provided HTML snippet
  5. Uses modern web technologies and CMS (AEM)
  6. No security policy or incident response info found
  7. Strong international presence with many localized domains
  8. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern front-end libraries such as Slick Carousel and FontAwesome. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and alternate hreflang links for internationalization. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and lazy loading of images. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and security features. The site structure supports a good user experience with clear navigation and rich content, although some compliance-related content is missing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with puratos.md. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review puratos.md.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.