Skip to main content

Security report for pujdemtudy.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Půjdem tudy' is a Czech language travel guide portal promoting trips and locations supported by the Operational Program Environment. It targets general audiences interested in travel and environmental tourism within the Czech Republic. The site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Smart Slider 3 and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking, although analytics consent is denied by default to comply with privacy concerns. The website lacks critical business contact information, privacy policies, and terms of service, which impacts its credibility and compliance posture. Technically, the site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and performance but has limited SEO due to the noindex, nofollow robots meta tag. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not evident from the data provided, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. Overall, the site appears legitimate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pujdemtudy.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pujdemtudy.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pujdemtudy.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as an informational travel guide focused on Czech environmental and cultural sites, likely funded or supported by governmental or environmental programs. Its market positioning is niche, targeting environmentally conscious travelers and local tourists. The business model appears content-driven, possibly supported by public funding or partnerships rather than direct commercial sales. There is no evidence of e-commerce or monetization through advertising networks beyond basic analytics. The absence of detailed company information and contact details limits the ability to assess growth or partnership ecosystems. The site’s partnership or subsidiary domains are not identified, indicating a standalone operation.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with no visible advanced security headers or policies. The site uses HTTPS, but no detailed SSL configuration data is available. The presence of Google Analytics with consent denied by default is a positive privacy measure. However, the lack of privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and incident readiness. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are present. The site should implement security headers, improve SSL/TLS settings, and publish clear privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including business email and phone numbers for support and incident reporting.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Conduct regular vulnerability assessments on WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks.
  5. Improve SEO by adjusting robots meta tags and enhancing metadata for better search engine indexing.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Navštivte s námi místa, která rozkvetla i díky Operačnímu programu Životní prostředí.
Key services
travel guide, trip selection, environmental program promotion
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Smart Slider 3, Snap.svg
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Google Analytics consent set to denied by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with denial by default for analytics and personalization.
  6. No explicit contact information or security policies are present.
  7. Content is focused on travel and environmental program promotion in Czech Republic.
  8. SEO optimization is minimal; robots meta tag is set to noindex, nofollow.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Social media icons present but no direct social media links found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern but basic tech stack including jQuery, Snap.svg, and Smart Slider 3 for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking, with consent mechanisms in place. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously, indicating some performance optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but SEO is hindered by restrictive robots meta tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider and SSL details are not disclosed, limiting full technical assessment. Overall, the infrastructure is standard for a small content portal but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pujdemtudy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pujdemtudy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.