Skip to main content

Security report for pubpub.org

PubPub · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PubPub is a community publishing platform focused on collaborative knowledge creation and dissemination. It is evolving towards a full-stack knowledge infrastructure platform under the parent organization Knowledge Futures Group. The website targets academic and research communities, providing tools for community publishing and knowledge sharing. The platform maintains a niche position in the technology and education sectors with a small organizational size. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Blueprint.js, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed query, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but the active social presence and consistent branding support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pubpub.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PubPub operates in the technology and education sectors, providing a specialized community publishing platform. Its business model revolves around offering collaborative publishing tools and evolving into a comprehensive knowledge infrastructure. The company benefits from its association with Knowledge Futures Group, enhancing credibility and partnership opportunities. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its open, community-driven approach and integration with academic workflows. Revenue streams are not explicitly detailed but likely include platform services and partnerships. The target customers are academic communities, researchers, and knowledge organizations. Growth indicators include the launch of a new PubPub Platform and active engagement on GitHub and Twitter. The partnership ecosystem includes Knowledge Futures Group and related domains. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that should be addressed to mitigate risks like clickjacking and content injection. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks especially under GDPR. The contact email is available for general inquiries but no dedicated security or abuse contacts are listed. Overall, the security culture appears moderate but could benefit from formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Provide dedicated security and abuse contact channels to facilitate reporting and response to security incidents.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to prevent vulnerabilities and maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PubPub
Description
Collaborative Community Publishing
Key services
Community publishing, Knowledge infrastructure platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Blueprint.js, Polyfill.io
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed query; no registrar or creation/expiry dates found.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  5. Contact email hello@pubpub.org is present and consistent with domain.
  6. Social media presence on Twitter and GitHub is active.
  7. Website content is focused on community publishing and knowledge infrastructure.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with Blueprint.js UI components, ensuring a responsive and accessible user interface. Polyfill.io is used to support legacy browsers. The site loads CSS and JavaScript bundles efficiently, indicating a well-structured front-end build process. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, enhancing usability. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of visible backend security policies. Opportunities exist to improve privacy compliance and integrate analytics with privacy considerations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pubpub.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pubpub.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.