Skip to main content

Security report for publiskoiepirkumukonference.lv

PUBLISKO IEPIRKUMU KONFERENCE · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website publiskoiepirkumukonference.lv represents an annual public procurement conference primarily targeting government officials, procurement professionals, and legal experts in Latvia. It provides updates on public procurement regulations, legal insights, and networking opportunities. The site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates WooCommerce, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The technical infrastructure is modern but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no advanced security configurations detected. Overall, the website is professional and serves a niche government-related audience, but the absence of WHOIS data and privacy documentation limits full trust assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching publiskoiepirkumukonference.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale event organizer focusing on public procurement conferences in Latvia, serving a specialized government and legal sector audience. Its competitive advantage lies in providing up-to-date regulatory and legal content relevant to public procurement professionals. The business model revolves around annual conferences and related services. Marketing efforts include tracking via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, indicating active audience engagement strategies. The website's content and branding are consistent, supporting a credible market position within its niche. However, the lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may impact user trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy concerns. The absence of privacy and terms of service pages further highlights compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. The site would benefit from enhanced security configurations, explicit privacy documentation, and incident response readiness to improve its security maturity and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  4. Audit and monitor third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PUBLISKO IEPIRKUMU KONFERENCE
Description
IKGADĒJĀ PUBLISKO IEPIRKUMU KONFERENCE Par aktuālo publiskā iepirkuma regulējumu, jaunā publiskā iepirkuma regulējuma darbībā novērtējums: trūkumi, ieguvumi un nepieciešamie uzlabojumi, no dažādiem skatu punktiem, par iepirkuma līguma grozījumiem: vai tiesiskais regulējums atrisina faktiskās vajadzības? Konkurences problēmātika publiskajos iepirkumos, Augstākās Tiesas un Eiropas Savienības Tiesas jaunākās atziņas publisko iepirkumu jomā…
Key services
annual public procurement conference, regulatory updates, legal insights, networking events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS detected (implied by URL)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based event/conference site focused on public procurement in Latvia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates marketing and tracking activity.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL assumed but not verified.
  8. No forms detected in the truncated HTML content provided.
  9. Content is professional, government-related, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and WooCommerce plugin, indicating a flexible and extensible platform. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel shows active marketing and analytics usage. The site appears mobile-optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Accessibility features are basic, and no broken elements or errors are detected in the provided content. Technical debt appears low, but security configurations require improvement to mitigate risks associated with third-party scripts and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with publiskoiepirkumukonference.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review publiskoiepirkumukonference.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.