Skip to main content

Security report for psvm.co

Other · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at psvm.co currently presents no accessible content, consisting solely of an empty HTML structure. This lack of content prevents any meaningful analysis of the business, its services, or its digital presence. The domain is registered through a privacy protection service, Domains By Proxy, LLC, and is locked against transfer or modification, which is common but reduces transparency. Hosting appears to be via Amazon AWS based on DNS records. No metadata, scripts, or contact information are available, indicating the site may be inactive or under development. From a technical perspective, the absence of content and metadata means no technologies, frameworks, or CMS can be identified. No security headers or SSL information is available, and the site does not present any privacy or cookie policies, nor terms of service. This results in a very low digital maturity and security posture. Security evaluation is limited due to lack of content, but the absence of HTTPS and security headers, combined with privacy-protected WHOIS data and no visible business information, suggests a low trust level. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or malicious content, but the site’s lack of transparency and content is a risk factor. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include establishing a secure, content-rich website with clear business information, implementing HTTPS and security best practices, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching psvm.co

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of website content and business information, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain is registered since 2016 and uses privacy protection, but no company name or services are disclosed. There is no evidence of market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams. The lack of contact details and business descriptions suggests the domain may be unused or reserved. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is poor due to the lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible security policies or incident response contacts. The domain is privacy protected and locked, which is standard but reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators are detected, but the lack of basic security measures and policies is a significant gap. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. Incident response readiness cannot be assessed due to missing contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan publicly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is minimal (empty HTML body), indicating possible blocking or placeholder page. No actual content to analyze. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is completely empty (no metadata, no text, no scripts).
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No security headers or SSL information available.
  5. Domain is registered with privacy protection and locked status.
  6. Hosting appears to be on AWS based on DNS servers.
  7. No external links or social media references found.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  9. Website is effectively inaccessible for meaningful analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently has no detectable technical infrastructure beyond DNS records pointing to AWS name servers. No CMS, frameworks, or scripts are present. The empty HTML indicates either a placeholder or blocked content. No performance or accessibility features can be assessed. The domain uses GoDaddy as registrar with privacy protection enabled. Technical debt is high due to lack of basic web presence and security configurations. Modernization opportunities include establishing a secure, content-rich site with proper SEO and accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with psvm.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review psvm.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.