Skip to main content

Security report for prusa-research.com

Prusa Research a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prusa Research a.s. operates a comprehensive e-commerce platform specializing in Original Prusa 3D printers, filaments, resins, and accessories. Founded by Josef Prusa, a key figure in the RepRap project, the company targets hobbyists, professionals, educators, and businesses with a strong emphasis on quality, community, and education. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Next.js, React, and Cloudflare, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and cookie consent management, although explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS registration data slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by strong branding and external trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prusa-research.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention prusa-research.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for prusa-research.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prusa Research holds a strong market position in the 3D printing manufacturing sector, leveraging direct sales and community engagement. Their business model combines product sales with educational content and community-driven platforms. The company benefits from partnerships with platforms like Printables and uses multiple advertising and analytics services to optimize marketing and user experience. The product range includes assembled and kit 3D printers, materials, and upgrades, catering to diverse customer needs from beginners to professionals. Growth indicators include active blog content, new product launches, and educational initiatives.

Security posture

The website employs robust security practices including HTTPS, bot detection via Cloudflare, and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent is comprehensive and GDPR-aware, with detailed cookie categorization and user control. However, the lack of publicly accessible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages linked prominently on the website.
  2. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Disclose data protection officer contact details to comply with GDPR transparency requirements.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prusa Research a.s.
Description
Eshop by Prusa Research a.s., company founded by Josef Prusa, one of the RepRap core developers. Selling Original Prusa 3D printers (incl. Prusa MK4, Prusa XL), filaments (especially in-house made Prusament), resins, and other accessories for 3D printing.
Key services
3D printer sales, Filaments and resins sales, Accessories and spare parts, Online courses, Community and software support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare, OneTrust Cookie Consent, LiveChat
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Cookie consent management
  • Session management cookies
  • Bot detection via Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Microsoft Advertising, TikTok, Pinterest, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
LiveChat, Mailmunch
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and third-party cookies listed
  2. Multiple product categories with pricing and discounts clearly presented
  3. Strong presence of customer reviews and external endorsements
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found in the provided content
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No data protection officer contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js framework with server-side rendering and optimized asset delivery. It uses Cloudflare for CDN and security, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity for analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and images. The technical stack is well-maintained with no visible deprecated or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance security transparency and formalize compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prusa-research.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prusa-research.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.