Skip to main content

Security report for provenexpert.com

ProvenExpert · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProvenExpert is a technology-driven SaaS platform specializing in customer review aggregation and reputation management. The company provides businesses with tools to collect customer feedback, combine reviews from multiple platforms, and display a unified rating seal to enhance online credibility and increase revenue through improved Google star ratings. The website targets businesses seeking to improve customer satisfaction and referral marketing effectiveness. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, but lacks publicly available security policies or incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, though the website content and business presence appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, ProvenExpert demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and direct contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching provenexpert.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention provenexpert.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26,528
Employees
2
Customers
26,526
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-12-05 · 7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for provenexpert.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –provenexpert.com2025-12-05
  • –www.provenexpert.com2025-11-08

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProvenExpert operates in the competitive customer review and reputation management market, leveraging a SaaS business model to provide value-added services to businesses across sectors. Its key competitive advantages include multi-platform review aggregation and integration with Google star ratings, which can drive higher click-through rates and customer trust. The company appears to focus on medium-sized businesses and enterprises looking to enhance their online reputation and marketing efforts. The platform's partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major review platforms and analytics providers. Growth indicators include multilingual support and a comprehensive privacy and cookie compliance framework. Strategic observations suggest that enhancing direct customer contact channels and publishing security and incident response policies could strengthen market trust and compliance posture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The use of Cookiebot indicates attention to privacy compliance and user consent management. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program represents gaps in transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is good but could be improved by adding explicit security documentation and direct security contact channels. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies, but further alignment with frameworks like ISO 27001 or NIST is not documented. Overall, the security culture appears positive but could benefit from enhanced communication and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security inquiries to enhance communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and publicly accessible.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProvenExpert
Description
ProvenExpert is a platform that helps businesses gather customer feedback and recommendations by combining reviews and ratings from all platforms into a single rating seal. It aims to increase clicks and revenue through Google star ratings and customer review marketing.
Key services
Customer feedback collection, Review aggregation, Rating seal display, Google star ratings integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, FontAwesome, Titillium Web font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
ProvenExpert review seal
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via form.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness assessment.
  6. Website uses modern fonts and icons with good mobile optimization.
  7. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are used for analytics and consent management.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Fonts and icons are loaded efficiently with preloading strategies. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as proper meta tags and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization in loading speed. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected from the HTML content. The technical implementation supports good SEO practices with canonical links, alternate hreflang tags for multilingual support, and Open Graph metadata for social sharing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid, supporting a professional and user-friendly web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100 −2Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with provenexpert.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review provenexpert.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.