Skip to main content

Security report for prove.com

Prove · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prove operates a leading digital identity verification platform trusted by over 1,000 companies globally, focusing on reducing fraud and improving consumer experiences. Their services span digital onboarding, authentication, identity management, and verified user solutions, targeting industries such as banking, fintech, healthcare, and marketplaces. The company leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and ClickCease for analytics and marketing, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible website experience. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with user consent mechanisms, reflecting good compliance practices. However, explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration verification, but the professional presentation and extensive developer resources indicate a legitimate and mature business. Overall, the website demonstrates strong technical maturity, good security posture, and solid business credibility, scoring an overall AI rating of 85.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prove.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prove's market positioning as a top-tier identity verification provider is supported by its broad industry coverage and extensive client base. Their B2B SaaS model focuses on API-driven solutions that integrate seamlessly into client systems, offering services like Prove Pre-Fill®, Prove Identity®, and Prove Auth®. The company targets regulated sectors requiring strong compliance and fraud prevention, such as banking and fintech, which suggests stable revenue streams and growth potential. The presence of developer portals, GitHub repositories, and partner programs indicates a strong ecosystem and commitment to developer engagement. While no direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, the website provides contact forms and sales engagement channels. The lack of visible certifications or security accreditations is a potential area for business enhancement. Overall, Prove appears well-positioned with a clear value proposition and a comprehensive service offering.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and includes key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, reflecting a strong baseline security posture. Cookie consent is implemented with an opt-in mechanism, supporting privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may impact trust among security-conscious clients. No direct security contact channels were found. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response information and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel to enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct security contact emails such as security@prove.com or abuse@prove.com.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prove
Description
Prove provides a digital identity verification platform trusted by over 1,000 leading companies to reduce fraud and improve consumer experiences.
Key services
Prove Pre-Fill®, Prove Identity®, Prove Identity Manager℠, Prove Auth®, Prove Verified Users℠, API Marketplace
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, ClickCease, Hotjar, Weglot (translation), Swiper.js
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-focused third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, ClickCease
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
ClickCease, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on identity verification solutions for multiple industries.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via forms.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and Weglot for multilingual support. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and ClickCease, enabling comprehensive user behavior tracking and fraud prevention. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with clean, semantic HTML and CSS. SEO best practices are followed with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of server-side technical details limits deeper infrastructure analysis, but the front-end implementation reflects a modern, maintainable, and scalable architecture. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation visibility and enhance security-related metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prove.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prove.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.