Skip to main content

Security report for proticketing.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website proticketing.com represents a ticket distribution system branded as ONEBOX, likely targeting event organizers and ticket sellers. The domain is mature, registered since 2011, and hosted using Cloudflare and Amazon S3 infrastructure. However, the website content is minimal and largely inaccessible due to Cloudflare's WAF challenge mechanisms, limiting the ability to fully assess the business and technical details. The site lacks essential compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, which impacts trust and transparency. Technically, the site uses modern CDN and security services but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Analytics are limited to Cloudflare Insights with minimal tracking. The website's design and content quality are poor due to the minimal content and lack of navigation or user engagement elements. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and DNSSEC. The absence of privacy and security policies and contact details indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site presents a low trustworthiness profile primarily due to content blocking and lack of transparency. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, publishing contact and incident response information, and improving website content and navigation to enhance user experience and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proticketing.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically providing ticket distribution services under the ONEBOX brand. The domain age suggests an established presence since 2011. The business model likely revolves around providing ticketing solutions to event organizers and possibly end-users. The lack of visible contact or corporate information limits insights into market positioning or partnerships. The use of Cloudflare and Amazon S3 indicates a reliance on robust cloud infrastructure. The absence of marketing or affiliate programs and minimal analytics suggests a low digital marketing footprint. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Cloudflare WAF provides protection against common threats. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating potential gaps in security governance. The minimal tracking and absence of exposed sensitive data are positive. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations cannot be confirmed due to missing policies. The site is partially blocked by Cloudflare's anti-bot mechanisms, which may impact legitimate user access.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The page contains Cloudflare challenge platform scripts and an invisible iframe typical of Cloudflare's anti-bot protection, indicating WAF protection and partial content blocking. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website appears to represent a ticket distribution system branded as ONEBOX, likely related to ticketing services.
Key services
Ticket distribution
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, Amazon S3 (for static resources), JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly blocked by Cloudflare WAF challenge mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  3. No contact information or forms are present on the page.
  4. Static resources are hosted on Amazon S3 and served via Cloudflare CDN.
  5. No social media links or business contact emails found.
  6. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata present.
  7. Website title indicates a ticket distribution system branded as ONEBOX.
  8. Security headers are not detected in the provided data.
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement.
  10. Cloudflare Insights is used for analytics with minimal tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services and hosts static resources on Amazon S3. The HTML is minimal and lacks meta tags, structured data, or Open Graph tags, limiting SEO effectiveness. The site includes Cloudflare Insights for analytics with minimal tracking. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate due to CDN usage, but mobile optimization and accessibility are poor. The presence of Cloudflare WAF challenge scripts indicates active security measures but also restricts content access. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and security risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but underutilized in terms of content and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proticketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proticketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.