Skip to main content

Security report for prostor-kzz.hr

Zavod za prostorno uređenje Krapinsko-zagorske Županije · Government · Croatia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Zavod za prostorno uređenje Krapinsko-zagorske Županije, a Croatian government institute responsible for spatial planning in the Krapinsko-zagorska County. It provides official news, spatial plans, documents, and public information access, targeting local residents, government officials, and urban planners. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and consistent branding, reflecting its role as a regional government authority. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap and jQuery with Google Analytics for visitor tracking. It is served over HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, although some security headers are missing. No forms or social media links were detected in the analyzed content. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and appropriate registration details consistent with a government entity. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and secure with room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prostor-kzz.hr

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute operates as a government entity focused on spatial planning and public administration within a regional context. Its business model is service-oriented, providing regulatory and informational services to the public and stakeholders. The website supports transparency and public engagement through news and document publication. Partnerships with regional tourism and development agencies are evident through linked domains. The organization is small-sized, founded in 2010, and maintains a consistent online presence aligned with its government mandate. Revenue streams are likely public funding rather than commercial. The site’s content and structure support its mission effectively, with moderate digital maturity and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner with granular options, indicating a good baseline for privacy and security. However, no explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) were detected in the HTML content, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface. Google Analytics is used for tracking, which is disclosed via cookie consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. Incident response and security policy pages are absent, which could be improved for transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced HTTP security headers and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and contact info to improve SEO and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zavod za prostorno uređenje Krapinsko-zagorske Županije
Description
Government institute responsible for spatial planning in Krapinsko-zagorska County, Croatia. Provides news, spatial plans, documents, projects, and public information access.
Key services
Spatial planning, Public consultations and announcements, Document and project publication, Information access facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Croatian government spatial planning institute site with official domain and contact info.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and relevant news updates.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with GDPR compliance.
  4. No security headers detected in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  6. No social media links explicitly found.
  7. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and appropriate registration.
  8. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern responsive design framework (Bootstrap) and jQuery for interactivity. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile optimization. No CMS or backend platform was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight solution. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No broken links or errors were observed. The site lacks advanced security headers and structured data markup, which are opportunities for modernization and improved security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prostor-kzz.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prostor-kzz.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.