Skip to main content

Security report for prosegur.es

Prosegur España · Other · Spain

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prosegur España is a leading security services provider in Spain, offering a broad portfolio including alarm systems for homes and businesses, surveillance, cash management, cybersecurity, and outsourcing services. The company targets both B2C and B2B segments with a strong market position as a trusted enterprise in the security sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates advanced consent management tools like Didomi, alongside Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, providing a trustworthy user experience. However, the inability to access WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prosegur.es

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
100
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prosegur España operates as an enterprise-level security company with a diversified service portfolio spanning physical security, cash logistics, and cybersecurity. Its business model leverages both direct consumer sales and enterprise contracts, supported by a strong brand and extensive partner network. The company maintains multiple regional domains indicating a broad international footprint. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on customer engagement through personalized alarm packages and digital contact forms. Marketing efforts utilize advanced tracking and consent management tools, reflecting a data-driven approach. The absence of explicit business registration details on the site is typical for large enterprises but could be improved for transparency. The company’s strategic partnerships and subsidiary domains indicate a robust ecosystem supporting its core operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. The integration of Didomi for consent management and the use of Google Tag Manager indicate attention to privacy and tracking controls. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and user trust in incident handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site’s forms appear to use standard protections but lack visible advanced anti-CSRF or input sanitization indicators. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and user trust.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prosegur España
Description
Prosegur, grupo líder de Seguridad en España, ofrece servicios globales (alarmas, vigilancia...) a hogares, negocios y empresas e instituciones.
Key services
Alarm systems for homes and businesses, Security services including surveillance and mobility, Cash management solutions, Cybersecurity services (Cipher), Outsourcing and BPO services (AVOS Tech)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent SDK, Ab Tasty, jQuery (implied by Bootstrap classes), Bootstrap CSS framework
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with configuration options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ab Tasty
Marketing tools
Ab Tasty
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging about security services.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to access restrictions, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No direct email contacts found in HTML; phone contact and forms present.
  7. Use of multiple Google Tag Manager IDs and third-party scripts for analytics and marketing.
  8. Mobile optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Magnolia CMS for content management, and integrates third-party services such as Didomi for consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts and uses preconnect and preload hints to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and layout. SEO is supported by canonical links, hreflang tags for internationalization, and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching strategies. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prosegur.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prosegur.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.