Skip to main content

Security report for proot.party

Private by Design, LLC · Other · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website proot.party is a personal site belonging to an individual known as strongsand, a high school student interested in cybersecurity, furry art, and gaming. The site is currently incomplete and serves primarily as a personal expression platform with links to related community sites. The domain is newly registered in late 2024, consistent with the site's early development stage. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on static HTML and CSS, hosted likely via Porkbun's DNS services. There is no evidence of advanced CMS or frameworks, and no analytics or tracking technologies are present. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS confirmation in the provided data, security headers, privacy policies, and contact information for incident response. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, with no privacy protection that would obscure ownership, which is appropriate for a personal site. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the content is accessible without restrictions. The site does not contain adult or explicit content and is safe for general audiences. Overall, the site scores moderately on content and business credibility but scores low on privacy compliance and security posture due to missing policies and security controls. The site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and providing contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proot.party

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a personal brand rather than a commercial business. It targets the furry art and gaming community, with a focus on social interaction and personal expression. The business model is non-commercial, with no monetization or service offerings evident. The domain is newly registered, indicating a startup phase. The external links suggest a community network but no formal partnerships or subsidiaries. The site lacks professional business information, certifications, or trust indicators, limiting its credibility in a commercial context.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. The absence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further weakens security readiness. The domain registration is secure with prohibitive status flags but lacks DNSSEC. Overall, the site is vulnerable to basic security risks and lacks formal security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
Personal website of an individual named strongsand, a high school student interested in cybersecurity, video games, and furry art. The site is incomplete and intended to showcase commissioned furry art, personal information, interaction guidelines, and online accounts.
Key services
Personal content sharing, Furry art showcase, Social interaction
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal site with basic content and navigation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. External links mostly to personal or community sites related to furry art and internet culture.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and shows a recently registered domain.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses simple static HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. The hosting is inferred to be via Porkbun DNS services, with no advanced platform or cloud hosting detected. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and assets. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO optimization is minimal, with no Open Graph or structured data present. The site lacks analytics or tracking technologies, indicating low digital maturity. There is an opportunity to modernize the site with responsive design, SEO enhancements, and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proot.party. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proot.party.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.