Skip to main content

Security report for prominion.net

Other · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website prominion.net currently serves only a default Apache HTTP server test page powered by CentOS, indicating that the site is either under construction, misconfigured, or abandoned. There is no actual business content, branding, or contact information available, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's operations or market position. The domain was registered in 2020 through a registrar entity, with no privacy protection, but no registrant business details are provided. Technically, the site uses Apache on CentOS with Bootstrap CSS, but lacks modern web features, security headers, and HTTPS enforcement. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and exposure of a default server page represent significant vulnerabilities and poor security posture. Privacy compliance is non-existent, with no policies or consent mechanisms detected. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prominion.net

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of any business content, contact information, or branding, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age is consistent with a small or new business, but the absence of any published content or services suggests the site is not operational. No partnerships, certifications, or market positioning information is available. The domain is registered via a registrar entity, which is common for domains not yet assigned to an end-user. There are no indications of revenue streams, target customers, or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture is weak. The site does not enforce HTTPS, lacks security headers, and exposes a default Apache test page, which can provide attackers with information about the server environment. No incident response or security policies are published. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security best practices. The domain DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web threats and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS redirects.
  2. Replace the default Apache HTTP server test page with actual business content or a proper landing page.
  3. Publish privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and integrity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This website currently displays a default Apache HTTP server test page indicating the server is operational but no actual business content is published.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Apache HTTP Server, CentOS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently a default Apache HTTP server test page with no business content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected from provided data.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain registered with a registrar entity, no direct business registrant info.
  6. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies detected.
  7. No social media or external business-related links found except for Apache, CentOS, and Internic references.
  8. Website is likely under construction, abandoned, or misconfigured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on Apache HTTP Server with CentOS Linux and uses Bootstrap for styling. The HTML is basic and valid but lacks meta tags for SEO and accessibility features. There are no scripts or analytics detected. The site performance is likely moderate but limited by minimal content. Mobile optimization is basic due to Bootstrap usage but not fully tested. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but likely a VPS or dedicated server given CentOS usage. The site shows signs of technical debt or incomplete deployment, as evidenced by the default server page and lack of content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prominion.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prominion.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.