Prometal Group SIA is a Latvian manufacturing company specializing in steel constructions and metal processing services. Established in 1997, the company evolved from woodworking equipment maintenance to a broader metal processing and machine building business. It serves a primarily industrial B2B audience with services including laser cutting, CNC bending, welding, and production of steel structures. The company employs approximately 50 people and maintains long-term client relationships, positioning itself as a reliable regional player in the manufacturing sector.
Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, and utilizes common web technologies such as jQuery, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimizations.
From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes tracking scripts but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.
The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices would enhance trust and reduce potential regulatory risks.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention prometalgroup.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for prometalgroup.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Prometal Group operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on metal processing and steel construction production. Its business model is B2B, targeting industrial clients requiring custom metal fabrication and machining services. The company has a stable revenue stream of approximately 2.5 million euros annually and a workforce of about 50 employees. The website reflects a professional image with clear service offerings and long-term client trust indicators. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The company does not publicly list subsidiaries or parent companies, indicating an independent operation. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the website, but client logos suggest established industrial collaborations. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and investment in modern metal processing technologies.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are present in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools like Hotjar and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. The lack of WHOIS transparency due to query limits limits domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and secure enough for general business use but requires enhancements to meet higher security and privacy standards.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
Add and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
Publish a security incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Prometal Group SIA
Description
Prometal Group is a manufacturing company specializing in steel constructions from sheet (1 to 20mm) and profile materials. Founded in 1997 originally as 'Zāģu Sevrviss', it evolved from woodworking equipment maintenance to metal processing and machine building services. The company employs about 50 people, serves approximately 250 clients annually, and generates around 2.5 million euros in revenue.
Key services
steel construction manufacturing, metal processing, laser cutting, pipe laser cutting, hydroabrasive cutting, CNC bending, mechanical processing, welding, robot welding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and Google Tag Manager usage)
Analytics and tracking
Services
Hotjar, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
Contact information includes a company phone number and email address with company domain.
No social media links or physical addresses explicitly found.
Website uses Mozello CMS and Cloudfront CDN hosting.
Tracking includes Hotjar and Google Tag Manager but no explicit cookie consent mechanism.
Content is business-focused manufacturing services with no adult or questionable content.
Security headers and explicit security policies are missing or not detectable.
Overall website quality and professionalism are good but privacy and security posture can be improved.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using Mozello CMS and leverages Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good availability and moderate performance. The technology stack includes jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3 for UI components, and Google Tag Manager combined with Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO optimizations and security headers. The absence of structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags limits rich search engine results. The site’s performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and optimization. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with prometalgroup.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prometalgroup.lv.