Skip to main content

Security report for prokonsumencki.pl

E-commerce · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prokonsumencki.pl is a Polish website providing comprehensive legal support services tailored for online sellers and e-commerce businesses. The site focuses on offering regulatory guidance, including preparation of internet shop regulations, to help sellers comply with legal requirements. The business operates in the e-commerce sector and targets Polish-speaking online merchants. The domain is well established since 2012, hosted by OVH SAS, and uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Divi theme, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Sendinblue, reflecting a moderate level of digital marketing sophistication. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and employs anti-spam measures like reCAPTCHA and honeypot plugins, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved. No privacy policy page was explicitly found, though cookie consent mechanisms are in place, suggesting partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for its niche legal consultancy services, but could enhance its security posture and privacy transparency to better align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prokonsumencki.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a specialized legal support provider for e-commerce sellers in Poland, a niche market with growing demand due to increasing online retail activity. Its business model revolves around providing legal documentation and consultancy, likely generating revenue through service fees or subscriptions. The target audience includes small to medium-sized online retailers seeking compliance assistance. The use of WooCommerce suggests some e-commerce functionality or product offerings related to legal services. The site’s market position appears focused and consistent, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries disclosed. The integration of marketing tools indicates active customer engagement efforts. However, the absence of explicit contact information and certifications may limit trust-building with potential clients. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2012, with consistent branding and good content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. Anti-spam and bot mitigation techniques such as Google reCAPTCHA and honeypot plugins are in use, reducing risk from automated attacks. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security or incident response policy published on the site, nor any vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The site uses third-party scripts and tracking pixels, which could introduce privacy and security risks if not properly managed. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, there is room for improvement in hardening the site and enhancing transparency around security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy page detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Zapewniamy kompleksowe wsparcie prawne dla Sprzedawców Internetowych potrzebne przy sprzedaży internetowej (regulamin sklepu internetowego).
Key services
Legal support for online sellers, Preparation of internet shop regulations, Compliance consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, WooCommerce, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Sendinblue, Tawk.to chat, reCAPTCHA, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Use of honeypot plugin for spam protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sendinblue
Marketing tools
Sendinblue, Tawk.to
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Polish legal support service for e-commerce sellers.
  2. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and WooCommerce plugin.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Security headers are missing or not detected in the provided data.
  6. SSL is enabled and valid.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  9. Content is professional and relevant to target audience.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme and WooCommerce plugin, indicating a flexible and widely supported platform. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sendinblue for marketing automation, and Tawk.to for live chat support. The site uses Google Fonts and reCAPTCHA for user experience and security enhancements. Hosting is provided by OVH SAS, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin, with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are technical risks. The site’s design and navigation are professional and user-friendly, supporting its business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prokonsumencki.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prokonsumencki.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.