Skip to main content

Security report for produzioneprofumi.it

M.L.G. · Manufacturing · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

M.L.G. is a specialized Italian company focused on high-quality custom perfume production for third parties, operating primarily in the manufacturing sector with a B2B business model. The company emphasizes craftsmanship and tailored services, offering full-service perfume production including packaging and filling. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses seeking private label perfume manufacturing. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and GDPR compliance tools, integrating Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but uses an outdated jQuery version and lacks some security headers. Security posture is good with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, but improvements are recommended in security headers and updating libraries. Privacy compliance is adequate with a privacy policy and cookie consent, though the cookie banner is noted as obsolete. Contact is primarily via a secured contact form. Overall, the site is trustworthy but has minor technical and compliance gaps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching produzioneprofumi.it

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

M.L.G. holds a niche position in the Italian perfume manufacturing market, leveraging a heritage of Italian craftsmanship and a 500-year tradition of perfumery. The company targets other businesses requiring private label or custom perfume solutions, offering versatile production capabilities. The business model is service-oriented manufacturing with a focus on quality and customization. The website supports this positioning with case histories and detailed service descriptions. Partnerships include an English version site and a credited web agency. No direct sales or e-commerce is present, indicating a focus on B2B relationships. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and improving digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, which are strong indicators of secure domain and transport layers. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on the contact form helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense in depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.12.4) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages are found, limiting transparency on security governance. Hidden spammy links embedded in the page source represent a reputational and security risk that should be remediated promptly. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update the cookie consent banner to a current GDPR-compliant implementation.
  2. Add a terms of service page to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest stable versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Remove hidden spammy links from the website source to protect reputation and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
M.L.G.
Description
Profumi su misura di alta qualità per conto terzi è la specializzazione di M.L.G. con sede vicino a Bologna. M.L.G. ha una produzione versatile ed è presente in diversi ambiti di mercato.
Key services
full-service perfume production, custom perfume manufacturing, packaging and filling services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v2, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, Contact Form 7, CF7 Conditional Fields
Frameworks
WordPress theme produzione-profumi-2018
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant and targeted to B2B perfume manufacturing clients.
  3. No terms of service page found, which is a minor compliance gap.
  4. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present but noted as 'obsolete' in banner text, suggesting update needed.
  6. Some hidden spammy links detected in hidden div (likely SEO spam injection) which is a security and reputation concern.
  7. No explicit phone numbers or emails found in visible content; contact only via form.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Use of older jQuery version may pose security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using a custom theme and standard plugins for contact forms and GDPR compliance. It uses jQuery 1.12.4, which is outdated and may pose security risks. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site loads a video on the homepage hero section and uses responsive CSS for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA labels and semantic HTML. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses DNSSEC and HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be modernized and hardened for security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with produzioneprofumi.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review produzioneprofumi.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.