Skip to main content

Security report for procuretech.ai

ORO - Smart Procurement Workflows · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ORO Labs is a technology company specializing in smart procurement workflows and supplier management tools designed to flexibly scale with evolving business needs. Positioned as a B2B SaaS provider, ORO targets businesses seeking efficient procurement solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with a focus on technology-driven procurement services. The company maintains active social media channels and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools to support its digital presence. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, HubSpot forms, and multiple tracking pixels such as Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Google Analytics. Cookie consent is managed comprehensively via Cookiebot, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed request, but the domain uses privacy protection, which is typical for technology companies. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and transparency. The overall risk assessment is low to moderate. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear security and incident response policies, and auditing third-party scripts regularly. These steps will improve trust and compliance, supporting ORO Labs' position as a credible technology provider in the procurement sector.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of procuretech.ai. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching procuretech.ai

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention procuretech.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for procuretech.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ORO Labs operates in the technology sector, focusing on procurement and supplier management solutions. Its business model is B2B SaaS, targeting enterprises needing scalable procurement workflows. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics platforms such as HubSpot, LinkedIn, and ZoomInfo to enhance lead generation and customer engagement. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized company with a consistent brand and professional digital presence. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for lead capture via forms and social media engagement. Growth indicators include active social media channels and integration of multiple marketing tools. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company appears well-positioned in its niche with a focus on technology-driven procurement innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with privacy regulations is good, but improvements in transparency and security best practices are recommended to enhance resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and integrations to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ORO - Smart Procurement Workflows
Description
A supplier management tool that can flex and scale with evolving business needs.
Key services
Smart procurement workflows, Supplier management tool
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, HubSpot forms, ZoomInfo pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses comprehensive cookie consent management via Cookiebot.
  2. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are integrated.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on landing page; contact via forms and social media.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  5. Website content is professional and targeted at B2B procurement technology users.
  6. No security policy or incident response contacts explicitly published.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Website is hosted on Webflow platform with standard modern web technologies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies and integrating multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, ZoomInfo, and Reddit Pixel. The site uses Google Fonts and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with granular consent levels. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's infrastructure, providing reliable uptime and moderate performance. The site is mobile optimized with good responsive design. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with procuretech.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review procuretech.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.