Skip to main content

Security report for proctors.co.uk

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proctors.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Proctors Group operates in the competitive B2B marketing sector, leveraging a full-service model that combines creative, strategic, and technological services. Their long-standing market presence since 1979 and a diverse service offering including ABM, SEO, and marketing automation position them well for mid to large enterprise clients. The company targets businesses seeking specialized marketing support, emphasizing measurable results and bespoke solutions. Their digital maturity is evidenced by the use of advanced analytics platforms and consent management, supporting data-driven marketing strategies. The partnership ecosystem includes major social media and video platforms, enhancing their marketing reach. The lack of visible domain registration data is a minor concern but offset by strong branding and client testimonials.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. Use of Google reCAPTCHA and absence of exposed sensitive data indicate good security hygiene. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The site would benefit from publishing explicit security documentation and appointing a data protection officer contact to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Establish and publicly share an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security readiness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to strengthen legitimacy and trust.
  4. Include data protection officer contact details to comply with GDPR and related regulations.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Proctors Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Proctors Group
Description
We are a B2B marketing agency specialising in branding and identity, marketing strategy, and technology solutions that resonate with your audience and supports your marketing team.
Key services
Brand strategy, Design, Content, Digital marketing, Website development, Technology solutions, Marketing automation, SEO, Account-Based Marketing (ABM), Campaign planning
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, PostHog, CookieYes, Vimeo, YouTube embeds, Lottie animations, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog, Plausible, Vimeo tracking, YouTube tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
PostHog, Plausible
Marketing tools
Active Campaign
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a commercial domain
  4. Strong branding and client testimonials present
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and address
  9. B-Corp certification prominently displayed
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proctors.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proctors.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.