Skip to main content

Security report for procore.dk

ProCore ApS · Technology · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProCore ApS is a Danish company specializing in professional web development, digitalization, and IT system integration primarily targeting small and medium-sized enterprises. The company has a solid market presence since 2002 and offers tailored solutions using the Umbraco CMS platform. Their website reflects a professional and trustworthy image with clear service offerings and customer testimonials. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The website is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching procore.dk

This scan found 12 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention procore.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for procore.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProCore operates in the technology sector focusing on web development and digital transformation services for SMEs in Denmark. Their competitive advantage lies in customized Umbraco CMS solutions and bespoke software integrations tailored to client workflows. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based web development, ongoing support, and integration services. The company targets businesses seeking digital modernization and efficiency gains. Growth indicators include a long operational history and diverse client testimonials. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes use of third-party analytics and marketing tools. Strategic observations suggest a stable, niche-focused operation with potential to expand security and compliance offerings to enhance market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating baseline compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which may delay response to security incidents. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. GDPR compliance is partially demonstrated through cookie consent and privacy policy presence but could be improved with more comprehensive documentation. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by expanding privacy policy details and data retention disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ProCore ApS
Registration number
31182808
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProCore ApS
Description
ProCore ApS is a professional web development and digitalization partner helping small and medium-sized businesses with tailored web solutions, digital process optimization, and system integrations.
Key services
Custom Umbraco CMS websites, Digitalization of business processes, System integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (Universal and GA4), jQuery 3.4.1, FontAwesome, CookieHub cookie consent, LeadScoreApp marketing script
Frameworks
Umbraco CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (UA and GA4), Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LeadScoreApp
Marketing tools
LeadScoreApp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear focus on custom web development and digitalization services.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieHub.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond cookie usage found.
  5. No visible contact forms on the homepage; contact info is in footer only.
  6. No terms of service or incident response contacts found.
  7. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; potential improvement area.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Umbraco CMS platform, leveraging modern frontend technologies including jQuery and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, alongside CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site could benefit from improved accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and enhanced security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with procore.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review procore.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.