Skip to main content

Security report for proagria.fi

ProAgria · Other · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProAgria is a Finnish company specializing in expert services and knowledge to enhance the competitiveness of agriculture and rural business operations. The company offers a broad range of services including management, finance, accounting, crop production, animal production, and sustainable development. Positioned as a leading service provider in Finland's agricultural sector, ProAgria targets farms and rural enterprises seeking professional consulting and development support. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a modern CMS (Craft CMS), responsive design, and structured data for SEO. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript frameworks and delayed Google Tag Manager loading to optimize performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though explicit cookie consent mechanisms and published security policies are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the business's market position and audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proagria.fi

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention proagria.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
17
Employees
1
Customers
6
Third parties
10
Weak passwords
18%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for proagria.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.proagria.fi2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProAgria operates in the agricultural consulting sector in Finland, serving rural businesses and farms. Its business model revolves around providing expert advisory, training, and support services to improve profitability and sustainability. The company maintains partnerships with related organizations and runs an online webshop. The presence of multiple regional centers and a broad service portfolio indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position. The website content and structured data confirm a consistent brand and clear communication of services. The company leverages social media channels for outreach and maintains a professional online presence. Growth indicators include active content updates, events, and customer stories. The partnership ecosystem includes agricultural associations and service providers, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and security headers such as Referrer-Policy and X-UA-Compatible present. Google Tag Manager is implemented with delayed initialization to reduce unnecessary tracking load. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a cookie consent banner and explicit security or incident response policies represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing policies and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR cookie regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Include contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to enhance compliance transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features with additional ARIA landmarks and keyboard navigation improvements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProAgria
Description
ProAgria tarjoaa asiantuntijapalveluja ja osaamista maatalouden ja maaseudun yritystoiminnan kilpailukyvyn kehittämiseen.
Key services
Johtaminen, Talous, Tilitoimisto, Kasvintuotanto, Kotieläintuotanto, Kestävä kehitys
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, Polyfill.io
Frameworks
Craft CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with delayed loading
  • No inline event handlers exposing sensitive info

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, relevant, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong presence of social media and structured data for SEO.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which is a minor compliance gap.
  6. Technical implementation uses modern frameworks and CMS.
  7. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers.
  8. No signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  9. Business information is consistent and verifiable.
  10. No suspicious or malicious external links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Craft CMS, a modern and flexible content management system, ensuring ease of content updates and scalability. The front-end uses Alpine.js for reactive UI components and polyfills for browser compatibility. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking with deferred loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter Cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is fast with preloading of fonts and lazy loading of images. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS and modern web standards. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and aligned with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proagria.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proagria.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.