Skip to main content

Security report for privacytools.com.br

Privacy Tools · Technology · Brazil

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Privacy Tools is a Brazilian technology company specializing in privacy management solutions, focusing on LGPD compliance, GRC, and ESG frameworks. Positioned as a pioneer in the Brazilian privacy market, it offers a comprehensive SaaS platform with modules for cookie management, consent management, DSAR handling, auditing, incident management, data mapping, data discovery, ESG controls, and AI governance. The company targets enterprises and organizations seeking to accelerate their compliance with Brazil's data protection laws. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional branding, client endorsements, and extensive service descriptions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine visibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, though explicit security headers and formal security policies are absent. Overall, the security posture is good with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Contact information is comprehensive, including email, phone, physical address, and contact forms with consent checkboxes. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing explicit security headers, publishing a formal security and incident response policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism. These steps would further strengthen the security and compliance posture, enhancing customer trust and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: yb744lybk4ajtd4gvxwmfsrvittjsqwsgk2nzxkcke7tf6sj4hja.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privacytools.com.br

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Privacy Tools holds a strong market position as a pioneer in Brazil's privacy management sector, offering a full-featured platform tailored to LGPD compliance. Its business model is SaaS-based, targeting medium to large enterprises requiring privacy governance, risk, and compliance solutions. The company leverages partnerships and related domains for marketing materials and educational content, indicating a robust ecosystem. The presence of notable client logos and active social media channels suggests healthy market traction and brand recognition. The platform's modular approach allows catering to diverse customer needs, from marketing UX to governance and compliance, supporting scalable growth and cross-selling opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. Use of Cloudflare DNS suggests additional network-level protections. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be exploited in certain attack vectors. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for incident handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved with formal policies and enhanced HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Privacy Tools
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy Tools
Description
Somos uma ferramenta de gerenciamento de privacidade. Acelere a adequação da sua empresa à LGPD agora mesmo. Conheça a Privacy Tools.
Key services
Gestão de Cookies, Gestão de Políticas, Gestão de Consentimento, Pedidos dos Titulares (DSAR), Auditoria, Gestão de Incidentes, Data Mapping, Data Discovery, ESG, Governança de IA
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare DNS, reCAPTCHA, Select2, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
RD Station
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on LGPD compliance and privacy management.
  3. Multiple social media and marketing integrations are present.
  4. Contact forms collect personal and corporate data with consent checkbox.
  5. Strong branding and client logos indicate established market presence.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business info.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern front-end libraries such as FontAwesome and Select2 for UI enhancements. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing tracking. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, offering performance and security benefits. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization, including comprehensive meta tags and structured JSON-LD data for rich snippets. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. The technical stack is standard for enterprise SaaS marketing sites, balancing functionality and maintainability. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium17 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privacytools.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privacytools.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.