Skip to main content

Security report for privacypartners.lt

Privacy Partners · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Privacy Partners is a Lithuanian-based consulting firm specializing in privacy, GDPR compliance, IT security audits, and risk management services. The company integrates legal, IT, and process management expertise to assist organizations in achieving compliance and enhancing their data protection posture. Their market position is that of a specialized niche player with strong professional certifications and memberships in relevant industry organizations. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides comprehensive information about their services and expertise. Technically, the site uses modern Angular framework, includes Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities detected, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and business credibility, though WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting full trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privacypartners.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention privacypartners.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for privacypartners.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets organizations requiring GDPR and IT security compliance support, offering a broad range of services including audits, external DPO services, legal documentation, training, and social engineering exercises. Their business model is consulting and professional services, focusing on small to medium enterprises primarily in Lithuania. The presence of multiple certifications and memberships in recognized associations enhances their competitive advantage and trustworthiness. The website content and structure support a professional image, aiding client acquisition and retention. The lack of WHOIS transparency is mitigated by visible trust signals and comprehensive contact information.

Security posture

Privacy Partners exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, the absence of certain security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. The disabled Google Analytics indicates a privacy-conscious approach. Incident response and security policy pages are not present, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional best practices implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to increase transparency and client trust.
  3. Enable privacy-respecting analytics or alternative tracking solutions to balance data insights with user privacy.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider WHOIS data transparency or verified domain registration to strengthen legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy Partners
Description
Privacy Partners provides privacy, IT security, and compliance consulting services, specializing in GDPR compliance, IT security audits, external data protection officer services, legal documentation, risk management, training, and social engineering exercises. They integrate legal, IT, and process management expertise to support organizations in Lithuania and beyond.
Key services
GDPR compliance assessments and audits, IT security audits, External Data Protection Officer as a service, Legal documentation and privacy protection processes, Privacy, risk management and compliance measures, Training and employee testing, Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) services, Social engineering (phishing) exercises
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 14, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (disabled by default), Material Icons, Roboto and Inter fonts
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form spam protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (disabled)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language
  2. Strong focus on GDPR and IT security consulting services
  3. Multiple professional certifications and memberships displayed
  4. Contact information is complete and includes physical address, phone, email, and contact form
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits or privacy protection
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected
  9. Google Analytics is included but disabled by default, indicating privacy awareness
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 14 framework, leveraging modern web technologies such as Material Icons and Google Fonts for UI consistency. It uses Google reCAPTCHA for form spam protection and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management, although Google Analytics is disabled by default. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized font usage. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with improved SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privacypartners.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privacypartners.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.