Skip to main content

Security report for privacymanager.io

LiveRamp · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveRamp is a mature enterprise technology company specializing in data collaboration and identity resolution platforms for marketers and their partners. The company holds a strong market position with a comprehensive suite of services including clean rooms, consumer data strategy, and cross-media analytics. Their platform enables secure and privacy-compliant data connectivity across digital and physical channels, targeting enterprise marketers and data professionals. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, hosted via Cloudflare and AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates excellent mobile responsiveness, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, domain locking, and consent management tools, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating high legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of privacymanager.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privacymanager.io

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
100
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveRamp operates in the technology sector focusing on enterprise data collaboration and identity services. Their business model is B2B, serving large enterprises and marketing technology partners. The company leverages a broad partnership ecosystem and offers extensive resources and training to clients. Their market presence is supported by a professional website with detailed solutions, customer stories, and partner directories. The company is US-based, founded in 2011, and maintains consistent branding and high-quality content. They actively engage in privacy and legal compliance, reflecting awareness of regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with strong domain registration protections, including multiple EPP status locks. Security best practices include the use of consent management (Ketch), Google Tag Manager for controlled script deployment, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved to enhance DNS security. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is found, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is robust for a public-facing enterprise website, with room for improvement in DNS security and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Continue monitoring third-party scripts and consent mechanisms to ensure privacy compliance.
  5. Regularly review and update security headers and SSL/TLS configurations to maintain best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LiveRamp
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LiveRamp
Description
LiveRamp provides the identity platform leveraged by enterprise marketers and their partners to deliver innovative products and exceptional experiences. The LiveRamp platform connects people, data, and devices across the digital and physical world, powering the people-based marketing revolution and allowing consumers to safely connect with the brands and products they love.
Key services
Data Collaboration, Identity Resolution, Clean Rooms, Consumer Data Strategy, Cross-Media Measurement & Analytics, Enterprise Identity, Marketing Impact, Media Networks
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, GSAP, Google Tag Manager, Ketch Consent Manager, Intellimize
Platforms
AWS (inferred from DNS nameservers)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status codes
  • Use of Cloudflare registrar
  • Consent management via Ketch
  • Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intellimize
Marketing tools
Intellimize, Bugherd
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  4. Use of modern marketing and consent management tools.
  5. No explicit security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data found.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business maturity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin, jQuery, GSAP animation library, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing scripts. Hosting is via Cloudflare registrar and AWS DNS infrastructure. The site is optimized for performance with preconnects, preloads, and lazy loading. Accessibility features and responsive design are well implemented. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a fast and user-friendly experience. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses a consent management platform (Ketch) to handle privacy compliance effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100 −1Low23 findingsView report
  2. 79/100 +4Low22 findingsView report
  3. 75/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privacymanager.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privacymanager.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.