Skip to main content

Security report for privacymanager.io

LiveRamp · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LiveRamp is a leading enterprise technology company specializing in data collaboration and identity resolution platforms. Serving over 900 global customers including Fortune 500 companies, LiveRamp enables marketers and partners to connect data across platforms, unlock insights, and deliver personalized marketing experiences. The company positions itself as a trusted partner in the evolving data privacy landscape, emphasizing data ethics and privacy compliance. The website reflects a mature, professional brand with comprehensive content and strong trust signals from major clients and research partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and SEO tools such as Yoast SEO Premium. Hosting is on Amazon AWS with a valid SSL certificate, though performance is somewhat slow due to a large number of resources and page size. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good but could be enhanced further. Privacy compliance is well addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms integrated via Ketch. Security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, a valid SSL certificate, and a bug bounty program in place. However, improvements are recommended such as enabling HSTS, adding DMARC records, and implementing additional security headers to harden the site further. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data indicate a trustworthy and consistent enterprise presence. The overall risk is low, with strategic recommendations focusing on enhancing security headers, improving site performance, and maintaining privacy compliance to sustain trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of privacymanager.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privacymanager.io

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
100
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LiveRamp operates in the technology sector, providing a B2B SaaS platform focused on data collaboration and identity management. Its competitive advantage lies in its expansive partner ecosystem and ability to connect data across diverse platforms securely. The business model revolves around enterprise subscriptions and partnerships with major brands and technology platforms. Revenue streams likely include platform access fees, professional services, and data collaboration solutions. Target customers are enterprise marketers, data teams, and partners in industries such as advertising, retail, media, and technology. Growth indicators include a large customer base, ongoing research initiatives, and a visible commitment to data ethics and privacy. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with official partner directories and industry transparency links. The company demonstrates strong operational maturity and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced via a valid Amazon-issued SSL certificate. No subdomain takeover vulnerabilities were found, and the presence of a bug bounty program indicates proactive vulnerability management. However, the absence of HSTS and DMARC records suggests room for improvement in transport security and email domain protection. Security headers are not explicitly detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerable or deprecated libraries were identified in the scripts loaded. The site uses consent management tools to comply with privacy regulations. Incident response contact information is not publicly detailed, which could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be elevated by implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Publish and enforce a DMARC record to protect against email spoofing and phishing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Optimize website performance by reducing resource count and page size to improve load times and user experience.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LiveRamp
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for SEO optimization. It uses jQuery, GSAP for animations, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags, and Ketch for consent management. Hosting is on Amazon AWS, indicated by IP addresses and SSL certificate issuer. The site has a large page size (~688 KB) and high resource count (267), resulting in slow load times (~15 seconds). The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and layout. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA and semantic HTML usage. SEO is good with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data present. There is technical debt in performance optimization and security header implementation. The site integrates multiple third-party scripts for marketing and analytics, which should be regularly audited for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100 −1Low23 findingsView report
  2. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
  3. 79/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privacymanager.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privacymanager.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.