Skip to main content

Security report for printon.ee

Printon AS · Manufacturing · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Printon AS is a well-established printing company based in Tallinn, Estonia, specializing in a wide range of printing services including books, magazines, catalogs, calendars, and advertising materials. The company positions itself as a comprehensive printing partner offering consultation, repro, printing, binding, post-processing, and logistics services all under one roof. Their market presence is supported by ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications, indicating a commitment to quality and environmental management. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information and service descriptions, targeting both business and individual customers in the region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and integrates modern web technologies such as Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and Slider Revolution. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, security headers present, and secure form handling, but lacks a formal security policy or incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional with no signs of malicious activity or suspicious behavior. However, improvements in cookie consent mechanisms and formal security disclosures would enhance compliance and user trust. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching printon.ee

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Printon AS operates in the manufacturing sector focused on printing services, serving a medium-sized market primarily in Estonia. Their business model combines B2B and B2C services with a strong emphasis on customer collaboration and quality. The company leverages certifications and a comprehensive service portfolio to maintain competitive advantage. Their digital presence supports lead generation through detailed product and service pages and a contact form. Partnerships such as with Vaba Maa AS for security printing expand their service capabilities. The company shows signs of stable growth and market positioning as a reliable local printing partner.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms reduces spam and bot submissions. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security practices are solid but could be improved by formalizing policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure compliance with EU cookie regulations.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Printon AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Printon AS
Description
Trükime: raamatud, ajakirjad, kataloogid, kalendrid, märkmikud, reklaammaterjalid. Trükikoda Tallinnas Peterburi tee 81, helista 6765100!
Key services
Consultation, Repro, Printing, Binding, Post-processing, Logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Slider Revolution, Gravity Forms, Monarch Social Sharing
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Monarch Social Sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support
  2. Comprehensive service and product offerings clearly presented
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed including phone, email, physical address, and contact form
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices observed
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service are available and appear comprehensive
  6. No signs of malicious content or suspicious behavior detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, integrating popular plugins such as Gravity Forms for contact forms and Slider Revolution for dynamic content. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The site loads moderately fast with optimized images and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and structured JSON-LD data. Some technical debt may exist in plugin management and accessibility compliance, but overall the infrastructure is stable and professionally maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with printon.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review printon.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.