Skip to main content

Security report for printmark.net

Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at printmark.net presents minimal content primarily consisting of an invisible tracking pixel and an embedded iframe from an external domain (findresultsquick.com). There is no visible business information, metadata, or legal policies, indicating a lack of transparency and professionalism. The site appears to function as a traffic monetization or redirect page rather than a legitimate business platform. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and JavaScript with no modern frameworks or CMS detected. The hosting appears to involve third-party CDN services. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement visible, no security headers, and the presence of potentially malicious third-party content. Privacy compliance is absent, with no privacy or cookie policies and no GDPR indicators. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility, indicating significant risks and lack of trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching printmark.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of any business-related content, contact details, or legal disclosures, it is not possible to ascertain the market positioning, business model, or target audience of printmark.net. The site lacks any trust indicators or certifications and does not demonstrate a clear business purpose. The presence of tracking pixels and external iframe content suggests a focus on advertising or traffic redirection rather than providing services or products. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the content.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is poor. The lack of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential interception and attacks. The embedded iframe from findresultsquick.com is suspicious and may pose security and privacy risks. No incident response or security policies are present, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not follow best practices for secure web development or data protection, increasing the risk of exploitation and user data compromise.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Remove or thoroughly audit third-party iframe content to eliminate potential security threats.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Publish clear contact information and business details to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Incorporate standard security headers and conduct regular security assessments to enhance protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, JavaScript
Performance
slow
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
cdn-fileserver.com (likely ad/tracking related)
Tracking pixels
cdn-fileserver.com pixel, findresultsquick.com iframe tracking
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and consists mainly of an invisible tracking pixel and an iframe embedding an external suspicious domain.
  2. No visible business information, contact details, or legal policies present.
  3. No metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found.
  4. No forms or user input fields detected.
  5. No social media links or company emails/phone numbers found.
  6. Website appears to be a redirect or traffic monetization page rather than a legitimate business site.
  7. Use of obfuscated tracking and ad scripts suggests potential privacy and security risks.
  8. No HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content; security headers not detected.
  9. Overall, the site lacks professionalism, transparency, and compliance with privacy regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and JavaScript, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It relies on third-party CDN and tracking services, which may introduce security and privacy concerns. Performance is likely slow due to external iframe loading and lack of optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic or poor, with no evident SEO enhancements. The site shows signs of technical debt and outdated practices, requiring modernization and security hardening to support legitimate business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with printmark.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review printmark.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.