Skip to main content

Security report for print.com

Print.com · Other · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Print.com operates as a professional print management platform targeting brands, agencies, resellers, and creatives. It offers a comprehensive catalogue of print products and services, including a web app, API, and digital asset management, connecting users to over 200 print partners across Europe. The platform emphasizes efficiency, collaboration, and sustainability, positioning itself as a trusted solution for frequent print buyers. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics integrations, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. The lack of WHOIS registrant data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and compliance efforts mitigate this risk. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching print.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Print.com targets a niche market of print professionals and agencies, leveraging a platform business model that aggregates print services from multiple partners. Its competitive advantage lies in streamlined ordering, price comparison, and collaboration tools. The presence of testimonials and a large client base indicates market acceptance. The integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests active customer acquisition and retention strategies. However, the absence of visible direct contact information on the main page may indicate a focus on digital self-service or app-based engagement. The missing WHOIS data is a potential red flag but may be due to privacy protection. Strategic partnerships with delivery providers and print partners enhance service breadth.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a baseline compliance with privacy regulations. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors, though no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML. The absence of security headers and explicit security policies reduces transparency and may expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security maturity. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration details to enhance legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Print.com
Description
Print.com, the printing company for professionals. Order business cards, brochures, promotional gifts and more in just two steps.
Key services
Web app for ordering prints online, API access, Digital asset management, Print product catalogue including business cards, brochures, banners, packaging, corporate gifts, Print management and collaboration tools, Shipping and delivery customization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Pinterest CT, Facebook Ads Pixel, Taboola, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads, Taboola
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest CT, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on print professionals and agencies as target audience.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools integrated.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact likely via app or subpages.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for a .com domain and warrants further verification.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery and various marketing and analytics integrations such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site uses Yoast SEO for optimization and loads fonts from Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The presence of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing security monitoring. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with print.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review print.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.