Skip to main content

Security report for pria.ee

Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet (PRIA) · Government · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PRIA (Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet) is the official Estonian government agency responsible for managing agricultural subsidies, registers, and providing information services to farmers and rural entrepreneurs. The website serves as a comprehensive portal offering subsidy information, registers, news, and e-services such as the e-PRIA login portal. The site targets Estonian agricultural stakeholders and the general public interested in rural development. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, employs modern web technologies, and integrates analytics and business intelligence tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, and shows no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture and good privacy compliance, supporting its role as a trusted government resource.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pria.ee

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PRIA holds a strong market position as the official government entity managing agricultural support in Estonia. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on subsidy administration and information dissemination. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on transparency, accessibility, and user support, with multiple language options and extensive informational resources. Partnerships with related Estonian agricultural portals and integration with official e-services enhance its ecosystem. The presence of social media channels and regular news updates indicate active engagement with stakeholders. The organization's medium size and government backing provide stability and credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. The use of nonce attributes in scripts suggests implementation of Content Security Policy measures, although explicit CSP headers were not detected in the provided data. No exposed credentials or sensitive information were found in the HTML content. The site uses secure forms with anti-bot measures and integrates trusted third-party analytics responsibly. However, additional security headers like X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy could further enhance protection. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not explicitly provided, indicating an area for improvement in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and stakeholder trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including official emails and phone numbers, to facilitate user support and compliance inquiries.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet (PRIA)
Description
PRIA is the Agricultural Registers and Information Board of Estonia, providing support services related to agricultural subsidies, registers, and rural development.
Key services
Agricultural subsidies management, Agricultural and rural registers, Information dissemination, E-services (e-PRIA portal), Consulting and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), PowerBI embedding, jQuery (implied by Drupal), CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce for CSP (Content Security Policy) scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government portal for agricultural support in Estonia.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multiple language options.
  3. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  4. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and integration with analytics and BI tools.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  6. Social media presence on official platforms enhances trust.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. Integration with Google Tag Manager and PowerBI indicates advanced analytics and reporting capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features, supporting a broad user base. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. The presence of structured data and meta tags supports SEO efforts. No hosting provider details were explicitly detected, but the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid, supporting the site's functional and security requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pria.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pria.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.