Skip to main content

Security report for pressure-tech.com

Pressure Tech Ltd · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pressure Tech Ltd is a UK-based manufacturer specializing in high-quality ISO-9001 certified pressure regulators designed for critical high-pressure control systems up to 1,380 bar. The company serves industrial sectors such as hydrogen fuel cells, oil and gas, subsea, diving, and petrochemical industries, positioning itself as a trusted supplier with a strong international reseller network. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, providing detailed product categories and clear contact channels. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics, hosted under a domain registered since 2003, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Overall, the site demonstrates good privacy compliance and business credibility, with room for technical and security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pressure-tech.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
57
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pressure Tech operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on pressure regulators and related accessories. Their business model includes direct sales and authorized resellers, targeting industrial clients requiring precision pressure control solutions. The company shows growth indicators through recent news updates and active recruitment. Memberships in industry associations and certifications like ISO-9001 and UKAS accreditation enhance their market credibility. The website content and structure support their market positioning as a reliable and quality-focused manufacturer. The presence of multiple contact methods and a newsletter subscription indicates engagement with customers and prospects.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a baseline security and privacy posture. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents potential areas for improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could affect transparency and preparedness. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but with opportunities to enhance defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pressure Tech Ltd
VAT number
GB 776 740 883
Registration number
4088229
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pressure Tech Ltd
Description
Pressure Tech manufactures high-quality ISO-9001 pressure regulators for critical high-pressure control systems up to 1,380 bar (20,000 psi).
Key services
Manufacture of pressure regulators, Custom solutions, Authorized reseller network, Technical support and sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of client-side input validation
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and comprehensive product information.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed user control options.
  3. Multiple contact methods including phone, email, and contact forms are available.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security mechanisms detected in HTML.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and not privacy protected, consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS or framework using jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The domain is registered with Amazon Registrar since 2003, indicating a stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with some legacy JavaScript usage and basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The site uses standard HTML and CSS with no major errors detected. Hosting details beyond domain registrar are not explicit. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pressure-tech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pressure-tech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.