Skip to main content

Security report for prerov.eu

Statutární město Přerov · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Statutární město Přerov operates an official municipal website serving residents, tourists, and local businesses by providing comprehensive information about city governance, public services, news, and events. The site functions as a key communication channel for the city administration, offering online services such as payment portals, grant applications, and contact directories. The website is well-branded with consistent city identity and includes multilingual support via Google Translate. Technically, the website uses a custom CMS called Public4u, with common web technologies including jQuery, jQuery UI, and Swiper.js for UI components. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features at a basic level. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Security is enforced via HTTPS, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with GDPR requirements. Security posture is generally good, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the site lacks explicit security headers and dedicated incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages, which could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, but the domain is consistent with an official city domain, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and functional digital presence for the city of Přerov, with recommendations to enhance security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility compliance to further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prerov.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention prerov.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for prerov.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Přerov as a statutory city with a strong digital presence focused on public administration and citizen engagement. Its business model is government service delivery through digital channels, targeting residents, businesses, and visitors. The site integrates multiple partner portals for real estate, payments, and grants, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The presence of local media and cultural event listings suggests active community involvement. The lack of commercial advertising and affiliate programs aligns with its government nature. Growth indicators include active news updates and event calendars. Strategic partnerships with local service providers and technology vendors support operational efficiency.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. Data protection practices are partially documented via GDPR information pages. The site uses third-party scripts including a chatbot, which should be regularly audited. Overall, the security culture appears adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues to increase transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Statutární město Přerov
VAT number
CZ 00301825
Registration number
00301825
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Statutární město Přerov
Description
Official website of the statutory city of Přerov providing information about city governance, services, news, events, and public resources.
Key services
City news and updates, Public administration information, Online services and forms, Event calendar, Contact directories, Public notices and legal information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Swiper.js, Custom JavaScript, CSS stylesheets
Frameworks
Public4u CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Translate integration, Nanotrix chatbot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for the city of Přerov, Czech Republic
  2. Content is comprehensive with news, events, and public service information
  3. Multiple language options available via Google Translate
  4. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance information present
  5. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy policy
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  8. Use of a chatbot service for user assistance
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  10. No explicit terms of service or incident response pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. The site is mobile responsive with dedicated CSS for print and screen media. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. The use of Google Translate for language switching is a practical solution but could be improved with native multilingual support. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed. The site uses a chatbot service from Nanotrix for user engagement. Technical risks include lack of advanced security headers and potential dependency on third-party scripts without visible integrity checks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prerov.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prerov.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.